» Articles » PMID: 38166768

Proficiency Testing of Diagnosis in Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry of Breast Pathology in China: Results from a Pilot Work of National Single Disease Quality Control Program for Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jan 3
PMID 38166768
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Pathologists are currently supposed to be aware of both domestic and international guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis, but it is unclear how successfully these guidelines have been integrated into routine clinical practice in China. Thus, this national proficiency testing (PT) scheme for breast pathology was set up to conduct a baseline assessment of the diagnostic capability of pathologists in China.

Methods: This national PT plan is designed and implemented according to the "Conformity assessment-General requirements for proficiency testing" (GB/T27043-2012/ISO/IEC 17043:2010). Five cases of breast cancer with six key items, including histologic type, grade, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67, were selected for testing among 96 participants. The final PT results were published on the website of the National Quality Control Center for Cancer ( http://117.133.40.88:3927/cn/col22/362 ).

Results: Our study demonstrated that the median PT score was 89.5 (54-100). Two institutions with scores < 67 were deemed unacceptable. The accuracy of histologic type, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was satisfactory (all > 86%). However, the histologic grade showed low accuracy (74.0%). The unacceptable results mainly included incorrect evaluation of histologic grade (36.7%), inaccurate evaluation of ER/PR/HER2/Ki67 (28.2%), incorrect identification of C-AD as IBC-NST (15.7%), inappropriate use of 1+/2+/3+ rather than staining percentage for ER/PR (6.1%), misclassification of ER/PR < 1% weak expression as positive staining (1.4%), and no evaluation of histologic grade in ILC, MC, and IMC (5.8%).

Conclusions: our nationwide PT program exhibited a satisfactory baseline assessment of the diagnostic capability of pathologists in China. More importantly, we identify some areas for further improvement.

Citing Articles

Challenges and improvements in HER2 scoring and histologic evaluation: insights from a national proficiency testing scheme for breast cancer diagnosis in China.

Xue X, Guo L, Guo C, Xu L, Li L, Yang L Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):128.

PMID: 39227982 PMC: 11373503. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01884-9.

References
1.
Aumann K, Niermann K, Asberger J, Wellner U, Bronsert P, Erbes T . Structured reporting ensures complete content and quick detection of essential data in pathology reports of oncological breast resection specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 156(3):495-500. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3769-0. View

2.
Allison K, Hammond M, Dowsett M, McKernin S, Carey L, Fitzgibbons P . Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(12):1346-1366. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02309. View

3.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

4.
Biganzoli L, Marotti L, Hart C, Cataliotti L, Cutuli B, Kuhn T . Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 86:59-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.017. View

5.
Sloane J, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq J, Bianchi S, Boecker W . Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists from 12 countries in diagnosing breast disease and reporting prognostic features of carcinomas. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology. Virchows Arch. 1999; 434(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1007/s004280050297. View