» Articles » PMID: 38164105

Dysregulated Salience Network Control over Default-Mode and Central-Executive Networks in Schizophrenia Revealed Using Stochastic Dynamical Causal Modeling

Overview
Journal Brain Connect
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jan 2
PMID 38164105
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuroimaging studies suggest that the human brain consists of intrinsically organized, large-scale neural networks. Among these networks, the interplay among the default-mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and central-executive network (CEN) has been widely used to understand the functional interaction patterns in health and disease. This triple network model suggests that the SN causally controls over the DMN and CEN in healthy individuals. This interaction is often referred to as SN's dynamic regulating mechanism. However, such interactions are not well understood in individuals with schizophrenia. In this study, we leveraged resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from schizophrenia ( = 67) and healthy controls ( = 81) and evaluated the directional functional interactions among DMN, SN, and CEN using stochastic dynamical causal modeling methodology. In healthy controls, our analyses replicated previous findings that SN regulates DMN and CEN activities (Mann-Whitney test;  < 10). In schizophrenia, however, our analyses revealed a disrupted SN-based controlling mechanism over the DMN and CEN (Mann-Whitney test;  < 10). These results indicate that the disrupted controlling mechanism of SN over the other two neural networks may be a candidate neuroimaging phenotype in schizophrenia.

Citing Articles

Machine learning-based prediction of antipsychotic efficacy from brain gray matter structure in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenia.

Guo X, Zhou E, Wang X, Huang B, Gao T, Pu C Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025; 11(1):11.

PMID: 39893207 PMC: 11787389. DOI: 10.1038/s41537-025-00557-6.


Heart Rate Variability and Interoception in Periodic Limb Movements in Sleep: Interference with Psychiatric Disorders?.

Malkiewicz M, Malinowski K, Grzywinska M, Partinen E, Partinen M, Pyrzowski J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458079 PMC: 11508612. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206129.

References
1.
Stephan K, Kasper L, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, den Ouden H, Breakspear M . Nonlinear dynamic causal models for fMRI. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(2):649-62. PMC: 2636907. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.262. View

2.
Zeidman P, Jafarian A, L Seghier M, Litvak V, Cagnan H, Price C . A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 2: Second level analysis with PEB. Neuroimage. 2019; 200:12-25. PMC: 6711451. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.032. View

3.
Gupta C, Calhoun V, Rachakonda S, Chen J, Patel V, Liu J . Patterns of Gray Matter Abnormalities in Schizophrenia Based on an International Mega-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2014; 41(5):1133-42. PMC: 4535628. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu177. View

4.
Chand G, Wu J, Hajjar I, Qiu D . Interactions of Insula Subdivisions-Based Networks with Default-Mode and Central-Executive Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017; 9:367. PMC: 5684105. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00367. View

5.
Shirer W, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, Menon V, Greicius M . Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 22(1):158-65. PMC: 3236795. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr099. View