» Articles » PMID: 38163872

Supporting Self-management in Women with Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: a Mixed-methods Sequential Comparative Case Study

Overview
Journal BMC Nurs
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38163872
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Maternal glycemia is associated with pregnancy outcomes. Thus, supporting the self-management experiences and preferences of pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes is crucial to optimize glucose control and perinatal outcomes.

Research Design And Methods: This paper describes the mixed methods integration of a sequential comparative case study. The objectives are threefold, as we integrated the quantitative and qualitative data within the overall mixed methods design: (1) to determine the predictors of glycemic control during pregnancy; (2) to understand the experience and diabetes self-management support needs during pregnancy among women with pre-existing diabetes; (3) to assess how self-management and support experiences helpe to explain glycemic control among women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy. The purpose of the mixing was to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data to develop rich descriptive cases of how diabetes self-management and support experiences and preferences in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during pregnancy help explain glucose control. A narrative approach was used to weave together the statistics and themes and the quantitative results were integrated visually alongside the qualitative themes to display the data integration.

Results: The quantitative results found that women achieved "at target" glucose control (mean A1C of the cohort by the third visit: 6.36% [95% Confidence Interval 6.11%, 6.60%]). The qualitative findings revealed that feelings of fear resulted in an isolating and mentally exhausting pregnancy. The quantitative data also indicated that women reported high levels of self-efficacy that increased throughout pregnancy. Qualitative data revealed that women who had worked hard to optimize glycemia during pregnancy were confident in their self-management. However, they lacked support from their healthcare team, particularly around self-management of diabetes during labour and delivery.

Conclusions: The achievement of optimal glycemia during pregnancy was motivated by fear of pregnancy complications and came at a cost to women's mental health. Mental health support, allowing women autonomy, and the provision of peer support may improve the experience of diabetes self-management during pregnancy. Future work should focus on developing, evaluating and implementing interventions that support these preferences.

Citing Articles

How and when paternalistic leadership influences service innovative behaviour while inhibiting counterproductive work behaviour among healthcare professionals: the roles of perceived supervisor support and public service motivation.

Hussain M, Luu T, Marjoribanks T J Health Organ Manag. 2025; 39(9):71-95.

PMID: 39891314 PMC: 11791749. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2024-0333.


The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.

Milasan L, Scott-Purdy D Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025; 34(1):e70003.

PMID: 39844734 PMC: 11755225. DOI: 10.1111/inm.70003.


Teachers' academic motivation and student procrastination behaviour: mediating effects of emotion regulation and study habits.

Sarwar S, Tara A, Abid M, Dukhaykh S BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):52.

PMID: 39825459 PMC: 11742506. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02352-5.


Impact of hopelessness on migration intentions of nursing students: a path analysis.

Berse S, Karacan E, Zivdir Yesilyurt P, Gungormus Z BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):29.

PMID: 39789566 PMC: 11715979. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02667-5.


Development and Psychometric Properties of the Therapeutic Relationship Assessment Scale-Patient (TRAS-Patient).

Coelho J, Ribeiro J, Ribeiro A, Trindade A, da Sequeira C, Roldan Merino J Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024; 34(1):e13422.

PMID: 39381853 PMC: 11751757. DOI: 10.1111/inm.13422.


References
1.
Cyganek K, Skupien J, Katra B, Hebda-Szydlo A, Janas I, Trznadel-Morawska I . Risk of macrosomia remains glucose-dependent in a cohort of women with pregestational type 1 diabetes and good glycemic control. Endocrine. 2016; 55(2):447-455. PMC: 5272887. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-016-1134-z. View

2.
Cordua S, Secher A, Ringholm L, Damm P, Mathiesen E . Real-time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes - observations from a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2013; 30(11):1374-81. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12246. View

3.
Fresa R, Visalli N, Di Blasi V, Cavallaro V, Ansaldi E, Trifoglio O . Experiences of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes during delivery from four Italian centers: a retrospective observational study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15(4):328-34. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0260. View

4.
Sushko K, Strachan P, Butt M, Nerenberg K, Sherifali D . Understanding the self-management experiences and support needs during pregnancy among women with pre-existing diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):309. PMC: 10152436. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05542-4. View

5.
Fadl H, Simmons D . Trends in diabetes in pregnancy in Sweden 1998-2012. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016; 4(1):e000221. PMC: 4985983. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000221. View