» Articles » PMID: 38161963

Susceptibility of Gram-negative Isolates Collected in South Korea to Imipenem/relebactam and Comparator Agents-SMART 2018-21

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38161963
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in South Korean medical centres to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents.

Methods: From 2018 to 2021, six hospitals in South Korea each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by 2023 CLSI breakpoints. Most isolates that were imipenem/relebactam, imipenem or ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible were screened for β-lactamase genes by PCR or WGS.

Results: Of all non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) isolates (= 4100), 98.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Most NME were also susceptible to imipenem alone (94.7%) and meropenem (97.3%); percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem β-lactam comparators were lower (68%-80%). Imipenem/relebactam retained activity against 96.4%, 70.8% and 70.6% of MDR, difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) and meropenem-non-susceptible NME, respectively, and inhibited 93.1% of KPC-carrying and 95.5% of ESBL-carrying NME. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant NME, 21/25 (84.0%) carried an MBL or an OXA-48-like carbapenemase. Of all isolates (= 738), 82.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible; percent susceptible values for all β-lactam comparators, including carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) were 61.5%-74.7%. Less than 20% of MDR and DTR isolates, and 41% of meropenem-non-susceptible isolates were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates, 61.6% carried an MBL and 37.0% did not possess any acquired β-lactamase genes.

Conclusions: Based on data, imipenem/relebactam, if licensed in South Korea, may be a viable treatment option for many hospitalized patients infected with common Gram-negative pathogens including NME exhibiting MDR, DTR and carbapenem resistance and many β-lactam-resistant phenotypes of .

Citing Articles

Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review.

Dan M, Talapan D Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1385475.

PMID: 38800756 PMC: 11116650. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1385475.

References
1.
Karlowsky J, Kazmierczak K, Bouchillon S, de Jonge B, Stone G, Sahm D . Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Asia-Pacific Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(7). PMC: 6021687. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02569-17. View

2.
Woodford N, Ellington M, Coelho J, Turton J, Ward M, Brown S . Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006; 27(4):351-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.01.004. View

3.
Lee Y, Ko W, Hsueh P . Geographic Patterns of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Asia-Pacific Region: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) Program, 2015-2019. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021; 66(2):e0200021. PMC: 8846487. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02000-21. View

4.
ODonnell J, Lodise T . New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022; 66(7):e0025622. PMC: 9295581. DOI: 10.1128/aac.00256-22. View

5.
Karlowsky J, Lob S, Young K, Motyl M, Sahm D . Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antimicrobial-resistant phenotypes from seven global regions: SMART 2015-2016. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018; 15:140-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.07.012. View