» Articles » PMID: 38156997

Are Periprosthetic Hip Fractures More Severe Than Native Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Resource Utilization

Overview
Date 2023 Dec 29
PMID 38156997
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of data comparing periprosthetic hip fracture (PPHFx) outcomes and resource utilization to native fractures. Many surgeons consider periprosthetic hip fractures to be more severe injuries than native fractures. The aim of this systematic review is to characterize the outcomes of PPHFx and assess their severity relative to native hip fractures (NHFx).

Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis systematic review was conducted using Medline, Biosis, and Cinahl. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), cost of management, disposition, complication rates, readmission rates, and mortality.

Results: 14 articles (13,489 patients) from 2010 to 2018 were included in the study. Study quality was generally low. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 month to 3.2 years. LOS ranged from 5.2 to 38 days. US cost of management was best estimated at $53,669 ± 19,817. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities ranged from 64.5 to 74.5%. Time to surgery ranged from 1.9 to 5.7 days. Readmission rates ranged from 12 to 32%. Per Clavien-Dindo classification, 33.9% suffered minor complications; 14.3% suffered major complications. 1 month and 1 year mortality ranged from 2.9% to 10% and 9.7% to 45%, respectively.

Conclusion: Time to surgery and LOS were longer for PPHFx relative to NHFx. Complications' rates were higher for PPHFx compared to NHFx. There is no evidence for differences in LOS, cost, discharge, readmission rates, or mortality between PPHFx and NHFx. These results may serve as a baseline in future evaluation of PPHFx management.

References
1.
Sloan M, Sheth N, Lee G . Is Obesity Associated With Increased Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Large Database Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(3):523-532. PMC: 6382191. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000615. View

2.
Varnum C . Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. Dan Med J. 2017; 64(3). View

3.
Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, Garellick G, Karrholm J . Incidence and demographics of 1751 surgically treated periprosthetic femoral fractures around a primary hip prosthesis. Hip Int. 2018; 29(3):282-288. DOI: 10.1177/1120700018779558. View

4.
Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs J, Estok 2nd D, Malchau H . Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(12):2658-62. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01538. View

5.
Smolle M, Horlesberger N, Maurer-Ertl W, Puchwein P, Seibert F, Leithner A . Periprosthetic fractures of hip and knee-A morbidity and mortality analysis. Injury. 2021; 52(11):3483-3488. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015. View