» Articles » PMID: 38155989

Early In-hospital Discontinuation of Aspirin on the First Post-procedural Day After Percutaneous Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulation

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous trials investigating antithrombotic therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and a P2Y12 inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), termed dual therapy, allowed a short period of triple therapy including a DOAC, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and aspirin.

Aims: This study aimed to determine whether discontinuation of aspirin on the first post-procedural day is safe or causes ischemic events.

Methods: Ischemic and bleeding events during hospitalization were investigated retrospectively in all patients treated with dual therapy (DOAC + P2Y inhibitor, designated as group 1) or triple therapy (DOAC + P2Y inhibitor+aspirin, designated as group 2) from day 1 after PCI at our center.

Results: Of 4,564 consecutive PCI procedures, 1,059 (23.2%) had an indication for OAC. Of these, 322 met the inclusion criteria for group 1 and 62 for group 2. Baseline characteristics, CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores showed no relevant differences between the two groups, and the main indication for DOAC therapy was atrial fibrillation in both groups. Approximately ¼ of patients were treated for acute coronary syndrome. The mean length of post-procedural hospitalization was 2.1 ± 2.5 and 2.2 ± 3.0 days in group 1 and 2, respectively ( = 0.305). One patient per group suffered a TIA ( = 0.297). There were no other ischemic events and no statistically significant differences in bleeding events. A subgroup analysis of cases hospitalized for ≥2 post-procedural days (group 1: 100 cases, mean 4.4 ± 3.4 days vs. group 2: 25 cases, mean 4.0 ± 4.1 days) confirmed these results.

Conclusion: The initiation of dual therapy and thus discontinuation of aspirin on the first postprocedural day appears to be safe with respect to short-term ischemic events in a real-world population. Almost ¼ of patients undergoing PCI have an indication for OAC, highlighting the relevance of this issue.

References
1.
van Rein N, Heide-Jorgensen U, Lijfering W, Dekkers O, Sorensen H, Cannegieter S . Major Bleeding Rates in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Single, Dual, or Triple Antithrombotic Therapy. Circulation. 2018; 139(6):775-786. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036248. View

2.
Capodanno D, Angiolillo D . Management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7(1):113-24. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001150. View

3.
Gibson C, Mehran R, Bode C, Halperin J, Verheugt F, Wildgoose P . Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(25):2423-2434. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611594. View

4.
Pisters R, Lane D, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos C, Crijns H, Lip G . A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010; 138(5):1093-100. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-0134. View

5.
Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Eckardt L, Tijssen J, Lewalter T, Gargiulo G . Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10206):1335-1343. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31872-0. View