» Articles » PMID: 38154945

Nurse-delivered Sleep Restriction Therapy in Primary Care for Adults with Insomnia Disorder: a Mixed-methods Process Evaluation

Abstract

Background: Sleep restriction therapy (SRT) is a behavioural therapy for insomnia.

Aim: To conduct a process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial comparing SRT delivered by primary care nurses plus a sleep hygiene booklet with the sleep hygiene booklet only for adults with insomnia disorder.

Design And Setting: A mixed-methods process evaluation in a general practice setting.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a purposive sample of patients receiving SRT, the practice nurses who delivered the therapy, and also GPs or practice managers at the participating practices. Qualitative data were explored using framework analysis, and integrated with nurse comments and quantitative data, including baseline Insomnia Severity Index score and serial sleep efficiency outcomes to investigate the relationships between these.

Results: In total, 16 patients, 13 nurses, six practice managers, and one GP were interviewed. Patients had no previous experience of behavioural therapy, needed flexible appointment times, and preferred face-to-face consultations; nurses felt prepared to deliver SRT, accommodating patient concerns, tailoring therapy, and negotiating sleep timings despite treatment complexity and delays between training and intervention delivery. How the intervention produced change was explored, including patient and nurse interactions and patient responses to SRT. Difficulties maintaining SRT, negative attitudes towards treatment, and low self-efficacy were highlighted. Contextual factors, including freeing GP time, time constraints, and conflicting priorities for nurses, with suggestions for alternative delivery options, were raised. Participants who found SRT a positive process showed improvements in sleep efficiency, whereas those who struggled did not.

Conclusion: SRT was successfully delivered by practice nurses and was generally well received by patients, despite some difficulties delivering and applying the intervention in practice.

References
1.
Kyle S, Miller C, Rogers Z, Siriwardena A, Macmahon K, Espie C . Sleep restriction therapy for insomnia is associated with reduced objective total sleep time, increased daytime somnolence, and objectively impaired vigilance: implications for the clinical management of insomnia disorder. Sleep. 2014; 37(2):229-37. PMC: 3900612. DOI: 10.5665/sleep.3386. View

2.
Falloon K, Elley C, Fernando 3rd A, Lee A, Arroll B . Simplified sleep restriction for insomnia in general practice: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2015; 65(637):e508-15. PMC: 4513738. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X686137. View

3.
Siriwardena A, Apekey T, Tilling M, Dyas J, Middleton H, Orner R . General practitioners' preferences for managing insomnia and opportunities for reducing hypnotic prescribing. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16(4):731-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01186.x. View

4.
Irvine A, Drew P, Bower P, Brooks H, Gellatly J, Armitage C . Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies. J Affect Disord. 2020; 265:120-131. PMC: 7049904. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.057. View

5.
Kyle S, Madigan C, Begum N, Abel L, Armstrong S, Aveyard P . Primary care treatment of insomnia: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing nurse-delivered sleep restriction therapy to sleep hygiene (the HABIT trial). BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e036248. PMC: 7059413. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036248. View