» Articles » PMID: 38153932

Comparing Undergraduate Research Experiences Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Quarantine: The Successful Adaptation of the BUILD PODER Summer JumpStart Program

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Dec 28
PMID 38153932
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many in person undergraduate research experiences (UREs) to pivot to remote online training. To investigate how the COVID-19 quarantine disrupted student URE outcomes over time, the current study examines Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Promoting Opportunities for Diversity in Education and Research (PODER) URE outcomes across different platforms (in-person, remote, and hybrid models) by comparing student survey data from 2019 to 2021. Participants consisted of three cohorts: 2019 (n = 26 students), 2020 (n = 33), 2021 (n = 34). The BUILD PODER Summer JumpStart program (SJS), which aims to increase diversity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) by recruiting mostly underrepresented students, was conducted in person in 2019, remotely in 2020 and using a hybrid model in 2021. All students completed an online survey on the first and last day of the four-week SJS program. We used one-way and mixed ANOVA models to analyze Cohort, Time (pre-test vs. post-test scores), and interaction of Cohort and Time for Research Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, Mentor Relationship, Mentee Knowledge, Health, Stress, and Student Program Satisfaction measures. Despite the platform changes, student scores increased significantly over time for all measures. There was a significant main effect of Time for Research Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, Mentor Relationship, Mentee Knowledge, Health Assessment, and Stress Management. Findings indicate that URE programs that are implemented remotely and using a hybrid format can provide students with experiences similar to in-person URE programs. In addition, remote UREs may provide added benefits compared to in-person programs. For instance, remote UREs could engage more historically minoritized students, who may experience barriers to access, such as work/family commitments, financial constraints, and geographic limitations.

References
1.
Collins T, Aley S, Boland T, Corral G, Cox M, Echegoyen L . BUILDing SCHOLARS: enhancing diversity among U.S. biomedical researchers in the Southwest. BMC Proc. 2018; 11(Suppl 12):12. PMC: 5773870. DOI: 10.1186/s12919-017-0095-4. View

2.
Malayil L, Negahban-Azar M, Rosenberg Goldstein R, Sharma M, Gleason J, Muise A . "Zooming" Our Way through Virtual Undergraduate Research Training: A Successful Redesign of the CONSERVE Summer Internship Program. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021; 22(1). PMC: 8060145. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2625. View

3.
. The Influence of On-Campus, Academic Year Undergraduate Research on STEM PhD Outcomes: Evidence from the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2011; 31(4):441-462. PMC: 3139981. DOI: 10.3102/0162373709348584. View

4.
Krim J, Cote L, Schwartz R, Stone E, Cleeves J, Barry K . Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of the Literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019; 18(4):ar65. PMC: 6889846. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-03-0069. View

5.
Speer J, Lyon M, Johnson J . Gains and Losses in Virtual Mentorship: A Descriptive Case Study of Undergraduate Mentees and Graduate Mentors in STEM Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021; 20(2):ar14. PMC: 8734387. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-06-0128. View