» Articles » PMID: 38150285

Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Black Persons Living in the United States Enrolled in a Community-based Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Dec 27
PMID 38150285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study examined repeat colorectal cancer screening rates at 12 and 24 months as part of a randomized intervention trial among Black persons living in the United States and factors associated with screening adherence.

Methods: Participants completed a survey assessing demographics and Preventive Health Model (PHM) factors (e.g., self efficacy, susceptibility) and received either a culturally targeted photonovella plus free fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits (intervention group) or a standard educational brochure plus free FIT kits (comparison group). FIT return was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months. Descriptive statistics summarized patterns of repeat screening. Logistic regression models assessed FIT uptake overtime, and demographic and PHM factors associated with screening adherence.

Results: Participants (N = 330) were U.S.-born (93%), non-Hispanic (97%), and male (52%). Initial FIT uptake within 6 months of enrollment was 86.6%, and subsequently dropped to 54.5% at 12 months and 36.6% at 24 months. Higher FIT return rates were observed for the brochure group at 24 months (51.5% vs 33.3% photonovella, p = .023). Multiple patterns of FIT kit return were observed: 37% completed FIT at all three time points (full adherence), 22% completed two of three (partial adherence), 29% completed one of three (partial adherence), and 12% did not return any FIT kits (complete nonadherence). Predictors of full adherence were higher levels of education and self-efficacy.

Conclusions: Full adherence to repeat screening was suboptimal. Most participants had partial adherence (one or two of three) to annual FIT screening. Future studies should focus on strategies to support repeat FIT screening.

Citing Articles

Protocol paper for an implementation science approach to promoting colorectal cancer screening in Federally Qualified Health Center clinics: A stepped-wedge, multilevel intervention trial.

Montoya S, Olaore P, Bastardo-Acosta J, Abdulla R, Schell M, Hidalgo A Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39070625 PMC: 11275978. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4558718/v1.

References
1.
Dougherty M, Brenner A, Crockett S, Gupta S, Wheeler S, Coker-Schwimmer M . Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(12):1645-1658. PMC: 6583619. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637. View

2.
Myers R, Ross E, Jepson C, Wolf T, Balshem A, Millner L . Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 1994; 23(2):142-51. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1020. View

3.
Zhong G, Sun W, Wan L, Hu J, Hao F . Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 91(3):684-697.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.035. View

4.
Davis S, Govindaraju S, Jackson B, Williams K, Christy S, Vadaparampil S . Recruitment Techniques and Strategies in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Study of Men and Women of African Ancestry. Nurs Res. 2018; 67(3):212-221. PMC: 5925754. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000274. View

5.
Davis T, Rademaker A, Morris J, Ferguson L, Wiltz G, Arnold C . Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening. J Rural Health. 2019; 36(3):307-315. PMC: 9396927. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12399. View