» Articles » PMID: 38150104

Reversed Cortico-medullary Differentiation in the Fetal and Neonatal Kidneys: an Indicator of Poor Prognosis?

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2023 Dec 27
PMID 38150104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation is rarely observed on fetal or neonatal renal ultrasound and is therefore a diagnostic challenge.

Objective: Our purpose was to widen the differential diagnoses of fetal and neonatal nephropathies introducing reversed cortico-medullary differentiation as a clue either on obstetric US or during follow-up of hyperechoic kidneys in order to improve the management of such rare clinical situations.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the US images of 11 patients showing bilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation on prenatal examination or in which this pattern developed postnatally in the follow-up of fetal hyperechoic kidneys. For each patient, a precise diagnosis was established either on clinical assessment or, when available, on histological or genetic findings.

Results: Six fetuses displayed bilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation on obstetric examination, and the pattern persisted throughout pregnancy. In the five other fetuses, the kidneys appeared initially homogeneously hyperechoic; this evolved into reversed cortico-medullary differentiation during the third trimester in two cases and shortly after birth in three cases. Two pregnancies were terminated because of estimated poor prognosis. In the nine surviving neonates, four died of renal failure in the post-natal period. The clinical evolution was more favorable in the remaining five newborns.

Conclusions: Six different diagnoses were established in patients presenting with a reversed cortico-medullary differentiation renal pattern. This finding was associated with poor outcome in six cases. An acute prenatal diagnosis of reversed cortico-medullary differentiation improves pre- and postnatal work-up and guides counseling and genetic testing.

Citing Articles

ESPR 2023-Building new bridges from Belgrade.

Lovrenski J, Pavicevic P Pediatr Radiol. 2024; 54(4):479-480.

PMID: 38300285 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-05866-z.

References
1.
Chitty L, Altman D . Charts of fetal size: kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23(11):891-7. DOI: 10.1002/pd.693. View

2.
Devriendt A, Cassart M, Massez A, Donner C, Avni F . Fetal kidneys: additional sonographic criteria of normal development. Prenat Diagn. 2013; 33(13):1248-52. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4240. View

3.
Cassart M . Fetal uropathies: pre- and postnatal imaging, management and follow-up. Pediatr Radiol. 2022; 53(4):610-620. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05433-4. View

4.
Chaumoitre K, Brun M, Cassart M, Maugey-Laulom B, Eurin D, Didier F . Differential diagnosis of fetal hyperechogenic cystic kidneys unrelated to renal tract anomalies: A multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28(7):911-7. DOI: 10.1002/uog.3856. View

5.
Avni F, Garel C, Cassart M, DHaene N, Hall M, Riccabona M . Imaging and classification of congenital cystic renal diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(5):1004-13. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8083. View