» Articles » PMID: 38148800

Compliance with CBT Referral in Nursing Home Residents Diagnosed with Depression: Results from a Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Dec 27
PMID 38148800
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Patient-level factors that influence compliance with a recommendation for CBT in nursing home residents diagnosed with depression were identified.

Methods: Within a cluster-randomized trial on stepped care for depression in nursing homes (DAVOS-study, Trial registration: DRKS00015686), participants received an intake interview administered by a licensed psychotherapist. If psychotherapy was required, patients were offered a referral for CBT. Sociodemographic characteristics, severity of depression, loneliness, physical health, antidepressant medication, prior experience with psychotherapy, and attitudes towards own aging were assessed. A binary regression determined predictors of compliance with referral.

Results: Of 123 residents receiving an intake interview, 80 were recommended a CBT. Forty-seven patients (58.8 %) followed the recommendation. The binary logistic regression model on compliance with recommended CBT was significant, χ(9) = 21.64, p = .010. Significant predictors were age (Odds Ratio () = 0.9; 95 % Confidence Interval () = 0.82, 0.99;  = .024) and depression ( = 1.33; 95 %  = 1.08, 1.65;  = .008).

Conclusion: Within the implemented setting compliance rate was comparable to other age groups. Future interventions should include detailed psychoeducation on the benefits of psychotherapy on mild depressive symptoms in older age and evidence-based interventions to address the stigma of depression. Interventions such as reminiscence-based methods or problem-solving could be useful to increase compliance with referral, especially in very old patients (80+). Language barriers and a culturally sensitive approach should be considered when screening residents.

References
1.
Biering P . Helpful approaches to older people experiencing mental health problems: a critical review of models of mental health care. Eur J Ageing. 2019; 16(2):215-225. PMC: 6509324. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-018-0490-3. View

2.
Gensichen J, Peitz M, Torge M, Mosig-Frey J, Wendt-Hermainski H, Rosemann T . [The "Depression Monitoring list" (DeMoL) with integrated PHQ-D-Rationale and design of a tool for the case management for depression in primary care]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006; 100(5):375-82. View

3.
Russell D . UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996; 66(1):20-40. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2. View

4.
Luck-Sikorski C, Stein J, Heilmann K, Maier W, Kaduszkiewicz H, Scherer M . Treatment preferences for depression in the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016; 29(3):389-398. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610216001885. View

5.
Wancata J, Alexandrowicz R, Marquart B, Weiss M, Friedrich F . The criterion validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006; 114(6):398-410. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00888.x. View