Investigating the Role of Spatial Filtering on Distractor Suppression

Overview

Journal Atten Percept Psychophys

Publisher Springer

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 2023 Dec 26

PMID 38148431

Authors

Vaishnavi Mohite

Seema Prasad

Ramesh Kumar Mishra

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In recent years, evidence has accumulated towards a distractor suppression mechanism that enables efficient selection of targets in a visual search task. According to these findings, the search for a target is faster in the presence of a salient distractor in a display among homogenous distractors as opposed to its absence. Studies have also shown that distractor suppression not only operates on the feature level but can also be spatially guided. The motivation of the current study was to examine if spatially guided distractor suppression can be goal-driven. We tested this across four experiments. In Experiment 1A, the task was to search for a shape target (e.g., a circle) and discriminate the orientation of the line within it. In some trials, a salient color distractor was presented in the display while participants were told that it appeared in one of the two locations on the horizontal axis (or the vertical axis, counterbalanced across participants). We expected enhanced distractor suppression when the salient distractor appeared within this "spatial filter" but did not find it since the target was also presented at the filtered locations. Experiment 1B replicated Experiment 1A, except that the target was always presented outside the filter; filtering enhanced search performance. In Experiment 2 even when the filter contained the salient distractor in only 65% of the filtered trials, filtering benefited search performance. In Experiment 3, the filter changed on every trial and did not benefit suppression.

References

Anderson B . The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015; 1369(1):24-39. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12957. View

Anderson B, Kim A . Selection History-Driven Signal Suppression. Vis cogn. 2020; 28(2):112-118. PMC: 7577375. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1727599. View

Arita J, Carlisle N, Woodman G . Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(3):580-4. PMC: 3817824. DOI: 10.1037/a0027885. View

Belopolsky A . Common Priority Map for Selection History, Reward and Emotion in the Oculomotor System. Perception. 2015; 44(8-9):920-33. DOI: 10.1177/0301006615596866. View

Blakley E, Gaspelin N, Gerhardstein P . The development of oculomotor suppression of salient distractors in children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2021; 214:105291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105291. View

Bogaerts L, van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J . Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022; 48(3):246-261. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000986. View

Britton M, Anderson B . Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019; 46(3):324-334. PMC: 7456594. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000718. View

Caputo G, Guerra S . Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Vision Res. 1998; 38(5):669-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00189-2. View

Chun M, Turk-Browne N . Interactions between attention and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007; 17(2):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005. View

10.

Duncan D, Theeuwes J . Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention. Cortex. 2020; 131:54-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.006. View

11.

Egeth H, Virzi R, Garbart H . Searching for conjunctively defined targets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984; 10(1):32-9. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.1.32. View

12.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

13.

Folk C, Remington R, Johnston J . Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992; 18(4):1030-44. View

14.

Gaspelin N, Leonard C, Luck S . Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(11):1740-50. PMC: 4922750. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615597913. View

15.

Gottlieb J . Attention, learning, and the value of information. Neuron. 2012; 76(2):281-95. PMC: 3479649. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.034. View

16.

Hamblin-Frohman Z, Becker S . Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load. J Vis. 2022; 22(2):8. PMC: 8857620. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.2.8. View

17.

Huynh Cong S, Kerzel D . New templates interfere with existing templates depending on their respective priority in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020; 46(11):1313-1327. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000859. View

18.

Luck S, Gaspelin N, Folk C, Remington R, Theeuwes J . Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate. Vis cogn. 2021; 29(1):1-21. PMC: 7872136. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. View

19.

Miyake A, Friedman N . The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012; 21(1):8-14. PMC: 3388901. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411429458. View

20.

Prasad S, Mishra R, Klein R . Re-examining attention capture at irrelevant (ignored?) locations. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021; 150(12):e57-e65. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001061. View