» Articles » PMID: 38142247

Simplified Capture, Extraction, and Amplification of Cellular DNA from Water Samples

Overview
Journal Anal Sci
Publisher Springer
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2023 Dec 23
PMID 38142247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA analysis in water samples is attracting attention in various fields. However, conventional methods for DNA analysis require a work-intensive and time-consuming sample pre-treatment. In this study, a simplified pre-treatment method for analyzing DNA in water samples was evaluated. The process consists of filtration, DNA extraction, and amplification, which can be achieved within a short time. In the filtration process, two types of filters, firstly a tissue paper (Kimwipe) and then a glass filter (GF/F), were used in sequence. The first large pore size filter enabled a reduction in filtration time by removing large particulate matter impurities present in river water matrix. Cells spiked into 1 L of river water were recovered at more than 90% within approximately 5 min filtration time. Also, DNA was extracted from the captured cells directly on the surface of the filter in only 5 min. Thus, DNA collection and extraction from a water sample can be completed within about 10 min. Furthermore, PCR amplification was performed directly from DNA-attached filter sections, which greatly reduced the number of required pre-treatment steps. Finally, we succeeded in establishing a simple and fast on-site pre-treatment system by using a hand-driven syringe filtration method. This pre-treatment system is expected to offer the possibility for the future establishment of a rapid and easy DNA analysis method applicable to various types of water samples.

Citing Articles

Sensor Arrays for Electrochemical Detection of PCR-Amplified Genes Extracted from Cells Suspended in Environmental Waters.

Aoki H, Kawaguchi M, Kumakura Y, Kamo H, Miura K, Hiruta Y Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598959 PMC: 11598411. DOI: 10.3390/s24227182.

References
1.
Martellini A, Payment P, Villemur R . Use of eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA to differentiate human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources in fecally contaminated surface water. Water Res. 2005; 39(4):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.012. View

2.
Merkes C, McCalla S, Jensen N, Gaikowski M, Amberg J . Persistence of DNA in carcasses, slime and avian feces may affect interpretation of environmental DNA data. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e113346. PMC: 4234652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113346. View

3.
Thomsen P, Kielgast J, Iversen L, Rask Moller P, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E . Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e41732. PMC: 3430657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732. View

4.
Foote A, Thomsen P, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn L . Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e41781. PMC: 3430683. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041781. View

5.
Thomsen P, Kielgast J, Iversen L, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert M . Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2011; 21(11):2565-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x. View