» Articles » PMID: 38141780

Quantification of Iliac Arterial Blood Velocity in Stenotic Phantom and Porcine Models Using Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of using quantitative digital subtraction angiography (qDSA) to quantify arterial velocity in phantom and porcine stenotic iliac artery models.

Materials And Methods: Varying degrees of stenoses (mild, <50%; moderate, 50%-70%; and severe, >70%) were created in a silicone iliac artery phantom using vessel loops. Two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed, with velocities calculated using qDSA. qDSA velocities were compared with flow rates and velocities measured with an ultrasonic flow probe. Two-dimensional DSAs of the common and external iliac arteries were then performed in 4 swine (mean weight, 63 kg) before and after a severe stenosis (>70%) was created in the iliac artery using 3-0 silk suture. Peak systolic velocities on pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound (US) before and after stenosis creation were correlated with the qDSA velocities. Pearson correlation, linear regression, and analysis of variance were used for analysis.

Results: In the phantom study, ultrasonic probe velocities positively correlated with downstream qDSA (r = 0.65; P < .001) and negatively correlated with peristenotic qDSA velocities (r = -0.80; P < .001). In the swine study, statistically significant reductions in external iliac arterial velocity were noted on US and qDSA after stenosis creation (P < .05). US and qDSA velocities strongly correlated for all flow states with both 50% and 100% contrast concentrations (r = 0.82 and r = 0.74, respectively), with an estimated US-to-qDSA ratio of 1.3-1.5 (P < .001). qDSA velocities with 50% and 100% contrast agent concentrations also strongly correlated (r = 0.78; P < .001).

Conclusions: In both phantom and swine stenosis models, changes in iliac arterial velocity could be quantified with qDSA, which strongly correlated with standard-of-care US.

References
1.
Pedersen O, Aslaksen A . Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1993; 17(3):596-601. DOI: 10.1067/mva.1993.39525. View

2.
Kundi R, Prior S, Addison O, Lu M, Ryan A, Lal B . Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Exercise-Induced Perfusion Deficits in Claudicants. J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 2(1). PMC: 5501290. DOI: 10.21767/2573-4482.100041. View

3.
Udoff E, Barth K, Harrington D, Kaufman S, White R . Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography. Radiology. 1979; 132(2):289-93. DOI: 10.1148/132.2.289. View

4.
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin E, Go A, Arnett D, Blaha M, Cushman M . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 133(4):e38-360. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. View

5.
Tetteroo E, Haaring C, van Engelen A, Van der Graaf Y, Mali W . Therapeutic consequences of variation in intraarterial pressure measurements after iliac angioplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997; 20(6):426-30. DOI: 10.1007/s002709900187. View