» Articles » PMID: 38137771

Accelerometry in the Functional Assessment of Balance in People with Stroke: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Dec 23
PMID 38137771
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Balance disturbances in people with lived experience of stroke affect activities of daily living and social participation, so assessing them is essential to know the level of functional independence. Accelerometers are electronic devices that allow kinematic variables of balance to be recorded and are a tool of great interest in the assessment of functional balance. To determine the validity and reliability of, as well as the most performed protocols using accelerometers in the functional assessment of balance in people with experience of stroke, a systematic search of articles published in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the PEDro and the Virtual Health Library from Spain was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the quality of the included studies. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, two studied reliability and validity, two studied reliability and four studied the validity of accelerometers in the assessment of balance in people with stroke. All studies indicated the kind of accelerometer, localization on the body, tests and outcome variables. The results indicate that accelerometers show excellent reliability values in the assessment of balance in people who had a prior stroke and disparate results in terms of validity. Triaxial accelerometers were most used, and the 4th and 5th lumbar and 1st and 2nd sacral vertebrae were the body areas most used for their placement.

Citing Articles

An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020.

Ahmadi Koupaei S, Ziaee M, Baharvahdat H, Ahmadi Z, Talebi Deluee M, Rezvani Kakhki B Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024; 12(1):35-41.

PMID: 38689795 PMC: 11057451. DOI: 10.30476/BEAT.2024.101708.1495.

References
1.
Chung J, Kim S, Yang Y . Correlation between accelerometry and clinical balance testing in stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28(8):2260-3. PMC: 5011573. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.2260. View

2.
Johansson D, Malmgren K, Alt Murphy M . Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review. J Neurol. 2018; 265(8):1740-1752. PMC: 6060770. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8786-y. View

3.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

4.
Bruyneel A, Dube F . Best Quantitative Tools for Assessing Static and Dynamic Standing Balance after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Physiother Can. 2021; 73(4):329-340. PMC: 8614595. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0005. View

5.
Domenech-Vadillo E, Aguilera-Aguilera G, Sanchez-Blanco C, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Guajardo C, Perez N . Normative data for static balance testing in healthy individuals using open source computerized posturography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 276(1):41-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5170-6. View