» Articles » PMID: 38137090

Stress and Right Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Interactive Effects on Visual Working Memory and Learning

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Dec 23
PMID 38137090
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stress impacts prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity and modulates working memory performance. In a recent study, stimulating the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) interacted with social stress in modulating participants' working memory. More specifically, stress disrupted the enhancing effects of dlPFC tDCS on working memory performance. The current study aimed to further explore these initial findings by randomizing healthy females to four experimental conditions ( = 130); stimulation (right dlPFC tDCS vs. sham) and (social stress vs. control). Participants performed cognitive tasks (i.e., visual working memory task and a visual declarative memory task) at baseline and post-stimulation. They also completed self-report measures of stress and anxiety. A significant × interaction was evident in the declarative memory (One-Card Learning, OCL) task, while working memory performance was unaffected. Though tDCS stimulation and stress did not interact to affect working memory, further research is warranted as these initial findings suggest that immediate visual-memory learning may be affected by these factors. The limited number of earlier studies, as well as the variability in their designs, provides additional impetus for studying the interactive effects of stress and tDCS on human visual learning.

References
1.
Farhat L, Carvalho A, Solmi M, Brunoni A . Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020; 17(1):43-60. PMC: 8866814. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa084. View

2.
Mustafa A, Woods S, Loft S, Morgan E . Lower prospective memory is associated with higher neurocognitive dispersion in two samples of people with HIV: A conceptual replication study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023; 29(7):677-685. PMC: 10801707. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617722000698. View

3.
Stricker N, Lundt E, Albertson S, Machulda M, Pudumjee S, Kremers W . Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of the Cogstate Brief Battery and Auditory Verbal Learning Test in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Defining Subtle Objective Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020; 76(1):261-274. PMC: 7546579. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200087. View

4.
Meiron O, Hermesh H, Katz N, Weizman A . Executive attention deficits in schizophrenia: putative mandatory and differential cognitive pathology domains in medicated schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 209(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.057. View

5.
Gaab J, Rohleder N, Nater U, Ehlert U . Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: the role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005; 30(6):599-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.001. View