» Articles » PMID: 38135850

Evaluation of Drivers of Treatment Switch in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: a Study from the Italian MS Registry

Abstract

Background: Active relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS) are currently defined as "relapsing MS" (RMS). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess drivers of treatment switches due to clinical relapses in a population of RMS patients collected in the Italian MS and Related Disorders Register (I-MS&RD).

Methods: RRMS and SPMS patients with at least one relapse in a time window of 2 years before of data extraction were defined as RMS. Factors associated with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) switching due to clinical activity were assessed through multivariable logistic regression models in which treatment exposure was included as the last recorded DMT and the last DMT's class [moderate-efficacy (ME), high-efficacy (HE) DMTs and anti-CD20 drugs].

Results: A cohort of 4739 RMS patients (4161 RRMS, 578 SPMS) was extracted from the I-MS&RD. A total of 2694 patients switching DMTs due to relapses were identified. Switchers were significantly (p < 0.0001) younger, less disabled, more frequently affected by an RR disease course in comparison to non-switcher patients. The multivariable logistic regression models showed that Alemtuzumab (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.37), Natalizumab (0.48, 0.30-0.76), Ocrelizumab (0.1, 0.02-0.45) and Rituximab (0.23, 0.06-0.82) exposure was a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses. Moreover, the use of HE DMTs (0.43, 0.31-0.59), especially anti-CD20 drugs (0.14, 0.05-0.37), resulted to be a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses in comparison with ME DMTs.

Conclusions: More than 50% of RMS switched therapy due to disease activity. HE DMTs, especially anti-CD20 drugs, significantly reduce the risk of treatment switch.

References
1.
Filippi M, Danesi R, Derfuss T, Duddy M, Gallo P, Gold R . Early and unrestricted access to high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies: a consensus to optimize benefits for people living with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2021; 269(3):1670-1677. PMC: 8501364. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10836-8. View

2.
Bayas A, Berthele A, Blank N, Dreger P, Faissner S, Friese M . Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: a position paper and registry outline. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023; 16:17562864231180730. PMC: 10540601. DOI: 10.1177/17562864231180730. View

3.
Gross R, Corboy J . Monitoring, Switching, and Stopping Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019; 25(3):715-735. DOI: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000738. View

4.
Ziemssen T, Derfuss T, De Stefano N, Giovannoni G, Palavra F, Tomic D . Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2015; 263(6):1053-65. PMC: 4893374. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7986-y. View

5.
He A, Merkel B, Brown J, Zhovits Ryerson L, Kister I, Malpas C . Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(4):307-316. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30067-3. View