Efficacy and Safety of Oral Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined with Conventional Anti-osteoporosis Drugs for Osteoporosis and Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral traditional Chinese medicine combined with conventional anti-osteoporosis drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis and fractures.
Methods: The database of China national knowledge infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wangfang (WANGFANG DATA), ChineseBioMedicalLiteratureDatabase, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 1st, 2023 for randomized controlled trials on oral Chinese medicine combined with conventional anti-osteoporosis drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis and fractures. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0. STATA 15.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Outcome measures included overall response rate, adverse events, T-score, bone mineral density, Oswestry Disability Index score, fracture healing time, and visual analog scale score.
Results: A total of 72 studies were included, involving 7847 participants. Different treatment options showed different advantages in the adjuvant treatment of osteoporosis and fractures. The total response rate, complication reduction, Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale score reduction, bone mineral density improvement and fracture healing time were all superior to drug therapy alone. The differences were statistically significant, but the improvement in T-score was not significant.
Conclusion: The combination of oral traditional Chinese medicine and conventional anti-osteoporosis drugs is more effective and safer than Western medicine alone in the treatment of osteoporosis and fractures, which indicated that the treatment of integrated Chinese and western medicine can promote the healing of osteoporosis and fracture. This approach had a promising clinical application prospect. Due to the limitations of included studies, the ranking results should be interpreted with caution. In the next step, we will further conduct subgroup data based on factors, such as conventional Western medicine treatment regimens, whether surgical treatment was performed, fracture locations.