» Articles » PMID: 38133684

Socioeconomic Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Prenatal Vs. Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningoceles

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38133684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate differences in sociodemographic characteristics and short-term outcomes between patients undergoing prenatal versus postnatal myelomeningocele repair.

Methods: Patients who underwent myelomeningocele repair at our institution were stratified based on prenatal or postnatal timing of repair. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify whether prenatal repair was a predictor of outcomes independent of socioeconomic measures.

Results: 49 patients underwent postnatal repair, and 30 underwent prenatal repair. Patients who underwent prenatal repair were more likely to have private insurance (73.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.03) and live farther from the hospital where they received their repair (251.5 ± 447.4 vs. 72.5 ± 205.6 miles, p = 0.02). Patients who underwent prenatal repair had shorter hospital stays (14.3 ± 22.7 days vs. 25.3 ± 20.1 days, p = 0.03), fewer complications (13.8% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01), fewer 30-day ED visits (0.0% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.001), lower CSF diversion rates (13.8% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.02), and better functional status at 3-months (13.3% vs. 57.1% delayed, p = 0.009), 6-months (20.0% vs. 56.7% delayed, p = 0.03), and 1-year (29.4% vs. 70.6% delayed, p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, prenatal repair was an independent predictor of inpatient complication (OR(95%CI): 0.19(0.05-0.75), p = 0.02) and 3-month (OR(95%CI): 0.14(0.03-0.80) p = 0.03), 6-month (OR(95%CI): 0.12(0.02-0.73), p = 0.02), and 1-year (OR(95%CI): 0.19(0.05-0.80), p = 0.02) functional status.

Conclusion: Prenatal repair for myelomeningocele is associated with better outcomes and developmental functional status. However, patients receiving prenatal closure are more likely to have private health insurance and live farther from the hospital, suggesting potential barriers to care.

References
1.
Kshettry V, Kelly M, Rosenbaum B, Seicean A, Hwang L, Weil R . Myelomeningocele: surgical trends and predictors of outcome in the United States, 1988-2010. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014; 13(6):666-78. DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.PEDS13597. View

2.
Acevedo-Garcia D, McArdle N, Hardy E, Crisan U, Romano B, Norris D . The child opportunity index: improving collaboration between community development and public health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(11):1948-57. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0679. View

3.
Ireys H, Anderson G, Shaffer T, Neff J . Expenditures for care of children with chronic illnesses enrolled in the Washington State Medicaid program, fiscal year 1993. Pediatrics. 1997; 100(2 Pt 1):197-204. DOI: 10.1542/peds.100.2.197. View

4.
Macias M, Roberts K, Saylor C, Fussell J . Toileting concerns, parenting stress, and behavior problems in children with special health care needs. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006; 45(5):415-22. DOI: 10.1177/0009922806289616. View