» Articles » PMID: 38132515

Advancing Dimethacrylate Dental Composites by Synergy of Pre-Polymerized TEGDMA Co-Filler: A Physio-Mechanical Evaluation

Overview
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38132515
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dental resin composites (DRCs) have gained immense popularity as filling material in direct dental restorations. They are highly valued for their ability to closely resemble natural teeth and withstand harsh oral conditions. To increase the clinical performance of dental restorations, various fillers are incorporated into DRCs. Herein, the effect of incorporating pre-polymerized triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (P-TEGDMA) as a co-filler in varying proportions (0%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10% by weight) into bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA)/TEGDMA/SiO resin composite was investigated. The obtained DRCs were examined for morphology, rheological properties, degree of crosslinking (DC), Vickers microhardness (VMH), thermal stability, and flexural strength (FS). The results revealed that SiO and P-TEGDMA particles were uniformly dispersed. The introduction of P-TEGDMA particles (2.5 wt.%) into the resin composite had a remarkable effect, leading to a significant reduction ( ≤ 0.05) in complex viscosity, decreasing from 393.84 ± 21.65 Pa.s to 152.84 ± 23.94 Pa.s. As a result, the DC was significantly ( ≤ 0.05) improved from 61.76 ± 3.80% to 68.77 ± 2.31%. In addition, the composite mixture demonstrated a higher storage modulus (G') than loss modulus (G″), indicative of its predominantly elastic nature. Moreover, the thermal stability of the DRCs was improved with the addition of P-TEGDMA particles by increasing the degradation temperature from 410 °C to 440 °C. However, the VMH was negatively affected. The study suggests that P-TEGDMA particles have the potential to be used as co-fillers alongside other inorganic fillers, offering a means to fine-tune the properties of DRCs and optimize their clinical performance.

Citing Articles

Innovative Poly(lactic Acid) Blends: Exploring the Impact of the Diverse Chemical Architectures from Itaconic Acid.

Carrasco-Fernandez M, Lopez-Martinez E, Flores-Gallardo S, Estrada-Moreno I, Mendoza-Duarte M, Vega-Rios A Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408489 PMC: 11478570. DOI: 10.3390/polym16192780.


Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties and Color Stability of Dental Resin Composites for Chairside Provisional Restorations.

Yu H, Yao J, Du Z, Guo J, Lei W Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39065406 PMC: 11280800. DOI: 10.3390/polym16142089.

References
1.
Habekost L, Camacho G, Lima G, Ogliari F, Cubas G, Moraes R . Nanoparticle loading level and properties of experimental hybrid resin luting agents. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21(7):540-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00867.x. View

2.
Stansbury J . Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions. Dent Mater. 2011; 28(1):13-22. PMC: 3245826. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.005. View

3.
Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G . Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(8):1819-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00308-8. View

4.
Halvorson R, Erickson R, Davidson C . The effect of filler and silane content on conversion of resin-based composite. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(4):327-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00062-3. View

5.
Al-Haj Husain N, Feilzer A, Kleverlaan C, Abou-Ayash S, Ozcan M . Effect of hydrothermal aging on the microhardness of high- and low-viscosity conventional and additively manufactured polymers. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128(4):822.e1-822.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.022. View