» Articles » PMID: 38129892

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Bilateral Asymmetry and Joint Angles of the Lower Limb for Females when Crossing Obstacles

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38129892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gait asymmetry is often accompanied by the bilateral asymmetry of the lower limbs. The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) technique is widely used in different populations and scenarios as a potential tool to improve lower limb postural control. However, whether cerebral cortex bilateral tDCS has an interventional effect on postural control as well as bilateral symmetry when crossing obstacles in healthy female remains unknown.

Methods: Twenty healthy females were recruited in this prospective study. Each participant walked and crossed a height-adjustable obstacle. Two-way repeated ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of group (tDCS and sham-tDCS) and height (30%, 20%, and 10% leg length) on the spatiotemporal and maximum joint angle parameters for lower limb crossing obstacles. The Bonferroni post-hoc test and paired t-test were used to determine the significance of the interaction effect or main effect. The statistically significant differences were set at p < 0.05.

Results: The Swing time (SW) gait asymmetry (GA), Stance time (ST) GA, leading limb hip-knee-ankle maximum joint angles and trailing limb hip-knee maximum joint angles decreased in the tDCS condition compared to the sham-tDCS condition at 30%, 20% leg's length crossing height except for 10% leg's length, whereas there was a significant decrease in SW/ST GA between the tDCS condition and the sham-tDCS condition at 30%, 20%, 10% leg's length crossing height (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: We conclude that tDCS intervention is effective to reduce bilateral asymmetry in spatio-temporal parameters and enhance dynamic balance in female participants during obstacle crossing when the heights of the obstacles were above 10% of the leg's length.

Trial Registration No: ChiCTR2100053942 (date of registration on December 04, 2021). Prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

References
1.
Patterson K, Gage W, Brooks D, Black S, McIlroy W . Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture. 2009; 31(2):241-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014. View

2.
Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S . Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 123(4):644-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.029. View

3.
Zhou J, Hao Y, Wang Y, Jordan A, Pascual-Leone A, Zhang J . Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces the cost of performing a cognitive task on gait and postural control. Eur J Neurosci. 2014; 39(8):1343-8. PMC: 4221849. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12492. View

4.
Huang L, Deng Y, Zheng X, Liu Y . Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Halo Sport Enhances Repeated Sprint Cycling and Cognitive Performance. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:118. PMC: 6383107. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00118. View

5.
Pan H, Hsu H, Chang W, Renn J, Wu H . Strategies for obstacle crossing in older adults with high and low risk of falling. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28(5):1614-20. PMC: 4905923. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.1614. View