» Articles » PMID: 38128943

Protection of the Third-dose and Fourth-dose MRNA Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariant: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Dec 21
PMID 38128943
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has raised concerns regarding waning vaccine-induced immunity and durability. We evaluated protection of the third-dose and fourth-dose mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant and its sublineages.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources: Electronic databases and other resources (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL PLUS, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, MedRxiv and bioRxiv) were searched until December 2022.

Study Eligibility Criteria: We included studies that assessed the effectiveness of mRNA vaccine booster doses against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes caused by the subvariant.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) at different time points after the third-dose and fourth-dose vaccination were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare VE of the third dose versus the primary series, no vaccination and the fourth dose at different time points. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results: This review included 50 studies. The third-dose VE, compared with the primary series, against SARS-CoV-2 infection was 48.86% (95% CI 44.90% to 52.82%, low certainty) at ≥14 days, and gradually decreased to 38.01% (95% CI 13.90% to 62.13%, very low certainty) at ≥90 days after the third-dose vaccination. The fourth-dose VE peaked at 14-30 days (56.70% (95% CI 50.36% to 63.04%), moderate certainty), then quickly declined at 61-90 days (22% (95% CI 6.40% to 37.60%), low certainty). Compared with no vaccination, the third-dose VE was 75.84% (95% CI 40.56% to 111.12%, low certainty) against BA.1 infection, and 70.41% (95% CI 49.94% to 90.88%, low certainty) against BA.2 infection at ≥7 days after the third-dose vaccination. The third-dose VE against hospitalisation remained stable over time and maintained 79.30% (95% CI 58.65% to 99.94%, moderate certainty) at 91-120 days. The fourth-dose VE up to 60 days was 67.54% (95% CI 59.76% to 75.33%, moderate certainty) for hospitalisation and 77.88% (95% CI 72.55% to 83.21%, moderate certainty) for death.

Conclusion: The boosters provided substantial protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes for at least 6 months, although the duration of protection remains uncertain, suggesting the need for a booster dose within 6 months of the third-dose or fourth-dose vaccination. However, the certainty of evidence in our VE estimates varied from very low to moderate, indicating significant heterogeneity among studies that should be considered when interpreting the findings for public health policies.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023376698.

Citing Articles

Rethinking Optimal Immunogens to Face SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Through Vaccination.

Blanco J, Trinite B, Puig-Barbera J Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025; 19(1):e70076.

PMID: 39871737 PMC: 11773156. DOI: 10.1111/irv.70076.


New COVID-19 vaccination recommendations in Spain: Optimizing for next seasons.

Arrazola P, Fernandez Prada M, Gil A, Gomez Rial J, Hernan C, Menendez R Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2025; 43(1):36-46.

PMID: 39845334 PMC: 11752446. DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2024.08.012.


Relative effectiveness of the second booster COVID-19 vaccines against laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: VEBIS HCW VE cohort study (1 October 2022-2 May 2023).

Savulescu C, Prats-Uribe A, Brolin K, Uuskula A, Bergin C, Fleming C Vaccine. 2024; 45:126615.

PMID: 39724693 PMC: 11790529. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126615.


Discovery of a pan anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody with highly efficient infected cell killing capacity for novel immunotherapeutic approaches.

Abba Moussa D, Vazquez M, Chable-Bessia C, Roux-Portalez V, Tamagnini E, Pedotti M Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 14(1):2432345.

PMID: 39584380 PMC: 11632933. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2432345.


Protective effect and molecular mechanisms of human non-neutralizing cross-reactive spike antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Clark J, Hoxie I, Adelsberg D, Sapse I, Andreata-Santos R, Yong J Cell Rep. 2024; 43(11):114922.

PMID: 39504245 PMC: 11804229. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114922.


References
1.
Bar-On Y, Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bodenheimer O, Amir O, Freedman L . Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(18):1712-1720. PMC: 9006780. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201570. View

2.
Planas D, Saunders N, Maes P, Guivel-Benhassine F, Planchais C, Buchrieser J . Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2022; 602(7898):671-675. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04389-z. View

3.
Thomas S, Moreira Jr E, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S . Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(19):1761-1773. PMC: 8461570. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345. View

4.
Spensley K, Gleeson S, Martin P, Thomson T, Clarke C, Pickard G . Comparison of Vaccine Effectiveness Against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant in Hemodialysis Patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2022; 7(6):1406-1409. PMC: 9006399. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.005. View

5.
Chemaitelly H, Ayoub H, Almukdad S, Coyle P, Tang P, Yassine H . Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3082. PMC: 9163167. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30895-3. View