Emotion and Anxiety Interact to Bias Spatial Attention

Overview

Journal Emotion

Publisher American Psychological Association

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Dec 21

PMID 38127536

Authors

Helena P Bachmann

Shruti Japee

Elisha P Merriam

Tina T Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Emotional expressions are an evolutionarily conserved means of social communication essential for social interactions. It is important to understand how anxious individuals perceive their social environments, including emotional expressions, especially with the rising prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anxiety is often associated with an attentional bias for threat-related stimuli, such as angry faces. Yet the mechanisms by which anxiety enhances or impairs two key components of spatial attention-attentional capture and attentional disengagement-to emotional expressions are still unclear. Moreover, positive valence is often ignored in studies of threat-related attention and anxiety, despite the high occurrence of happy faces during everyday social interaction. Here, we investigated the relationship between anxiety, emotional valence, and spatial attention in 574 participants across two preregistered studies (data collected in 2021 and 2022; Experiment 1: = 154, 54.5% male, = 43.5 years; Experiment 2: = 420, 58% male, = 36.46 years). We found that happy faces capture attention more quickly than angry faces during the visual search experiment and found delayed disengagement from both angry and happy faces over neutral faces during the spatial cueing experiment. We also show that anxiety has a distinct impact on both attentional capture and disengagement of emotional faces. Together, our findings highlight the role of positively valenced stimuli in attracting and holding attention and suggest that anxiety is a critical factor in modulating spatial attention to emotional stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

References

Peck C, Salzman C . Amygdala neural activity reflects spatial attention towards stimuli promising reward or threatening punishment. Elife. 2014; 3. PMC: 4238057. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04478. View

Cisler J, Koster E . Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 30(2):203-16. PMC: 2814889. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003. View

Richards H, Benson V, Donnelly N, Hadwin J . Exploring the function of selective attention and hypervigilance for threat in anxiety. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013; 34(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.006. View

Frewen P, Dozois D, Joanisse M, Neufeld R . Selective attention to threat versus reward: meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007; 28(2):307-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.05.006. View

Stoet G . PsyToolkit: a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42(4):1096-104. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096. View

Taylor C, Cross K, Amir N . Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety symptoms and attentional disengagement from threatening information. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015; 50:68-76. PMC: 4656135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.008. View

Barry T, Vervliet B, Hermans D . An integrative review of attention biases and their contribution to treatment for anxiety disorders. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:968. PMC: 4495309. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00968. View

Marsh A . Fear signals vulnerability and appeasement, not threat. Behav Brain Sci. 2023; 46:e71. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22001753. View

Vetter P, Badde S, Phelps E, Carrasco M . Emotional faces guide the eyes in the absence of awareness. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6382349. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.43467. View

10.

Vuilleumier P, Pourtois G . Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 45(1):174-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003. View

11.

Hirsch C, Mathews A . A cognitive model of pathological worry. Behav Res Ther. 2012; 50(10):636-46. PMC: 3444754. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007. View

12.

Coelho C, Cloete S, Wallis G . The face-in-the-crowd effect: when angry faces are just cross(es). J Vis. 2010; 10(1):7.1-14. DOI: 10.1167/10.1.7. View

13.

Bandelow B, Michaelis S . Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015; 17(3):327-35. PMC: 4610617. View

14.

Barbot A, Carrasco M . Emotion and anxiety potentiate the way attention alters visual appearance. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):5938. PMC: 5897558. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23686-8. View

15.

Peck C, Lau B, Salzman C . The primate amygdala combines information about space and value. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(3):340-8. PMC: 3596258. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3328. View

16.

Savage R, Lipp O, Craig B, Becker S, Horstmann G . In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search. Emotion. 2013; 13(4):758-68. DOI: 10.1037/a0031970. View

17.

McNally R . Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018; 69:4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005. View

18.

Frischen A, Eastwood J, Smilek D . Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134(5):662-676. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.662. View

19.

Rodebaugh T, Scullin R, Langer J, Dixon D, Huppert J, Bernstein A . Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016; 125(6):840-51. PMC: 4980228. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000184. View

20.

Fox E, Damjanovic L . The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. Emotion. 2006; 6(3):534-9. PMC: 1852642. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.534. View