» Articles » PMID: 38125848

Dichotomous Outcomes Vs. Survival Regression Models for Identification of Predictors of Mortality Among Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Illness During COVID-19 Pandemics

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Dec 21
PMID 38125848
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: As the studies predicting mortality in severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) have inferred associations either from dichotomous outcomes or from time-event models, we identified some clinical-epidemiological characteristics and predictors of mortality by comparing and discussing two multivariate models.

Methods: To identify factors associated with death among all SARI hospitalizations occurred in Botucatu (Brazil)/regardless of the infectious agent, and among the COVID-19 subgroup, from March 2020 to 2022, we used a multivariate Poisson regression model with binomial outcomes and Cox proportional hazards (time-event). The performance metrics of both models were also analyzed.

Results: A total of 3,995 hospitalized subjects were included, of whom 1338 (33%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We identified 866 deaths, of which 371 (43%) were due to the COVID-19. In the total number of SARI cases, using both Poisson and Cox models, the predictors of mortality were the presence of neurological diseases, immunosuppression, obesity, older age, and need for invasive ventilation support. However, the Poisson test also revealed that admission to an intensive care unit and the COVID-19 diagnosis were predictors of mortality, with the female gender having a protective effect against death. Likewise, Poisson proved to be more sensitive and specific, and indeed the most suitable model for analyzing risk factors for death in patients with SARI/COVID-19.

Conclusion: Given these results and the acute course of SARI and COVID-19, to compare the associations and their different meanings is essential and, therefore, models with dichotomous outcomes are more appropriate than time-to-event/survival approaches.

References
1.
Sansone N, Boschiero M, Marson F . Epidemiologic Profile of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection in Brazil During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Epidemiological Study. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:911036. PMC: 9288583. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.911036. View

2.
Clemens S, Fortaleza C, Crowe M, Tasca K, Spadaro A, Souza-Neto J . Effectiveness of the Fiocruz recombinant ChadOx1-nCoV19 against variants of SARS-CoV-2 in the Municipality of Botucatu-SP. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1016402. PMC: 9610568. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1016402. View

3.
Marques Moralejo Bermudi P, Lorenz C, de Aguiar B, Failla M, Barrozo L, Chiaravalloti-Neto F . Spatiotemporal ecological study of COVID-19 mortality in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: Shifting of the high mortality risk from areas with the best to those with the worst socio-economic conditions. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020; 39:101945. PMC: 7709594. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101945. View

4.
Collins G, Reitsma J, Altman D, Moons K . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7594. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7594. View

5.
Yin Y, Wunderink R . MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology. 2017; 23(2):130-137. PMC: 7169239. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13196. View