» Articles » PMID: 38114967

Postoperative Pain of Single-visit Endodontic Treatment with Gutta-percha Versus MTA Filling: a Randomized Superiority Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Dec 20
PMID 38114967
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain has remained a challenge for clinicians. This randomized superiority trial compared the levels of postoperative pain following the use of gutta-percha (GP) and sealer or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as root canal filling materials in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis.

Methods: A total of 119 patients were initially evaluated in this two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, superiority randomized trial. The inclusion criteria were participants aged 18-65 years with single-canal premolars diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The participants were finally divided into two groups using the permuted block randomization method. In the GP group (N = 46), the cleaned and shaped root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, while in the MTA group (N = 48), the cleaned and shaped root canals were filled with an MTA apical filling and a coronal gutta-percha and sealer. Patient pain level was measured 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The data were analyzed by the chi-square, independent t, Friedman, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The mean of VAS scores decreased significantly over time in both groups (P < 0.001). The mean VAS scores were significantly lower in the MTA filling group than in the other group (P < 0.05). Female patients reported higher VAS scores at 6- and 12-hour periods in both groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: MTA as a root canal filling material might be a valuable option for clinicians due to its low postoperative pain.

Trial Registration: The trial protocol was registered at the Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20191104045331N1).

Citing Articles

Low-level laser treatment's ability to reduce dry socket pain.

Minervini G, Franco R, Martelli M, Hafedh S, Marrapodi M, Di Blasio M Acta Odontol Scand. 2024; 83:631-641.

PMID: 39530606 PMC: 11633036. DOI: 10.2340/aos.v83.42261.

References
1.
Xavier M, Costa A, Caramelo F, Palma P, Ramos J . Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(17). PMC: 8434275. DOI: 10.3390/ma14175055. View

2.
Kaur A, Shah N, Logani A, Mishra N . Biotoxicity of commonly used root canal sealers: A meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(2):83-8. PMC: 4379664. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.153054. View

3.
Staffoli S, Plotino G, Nunez Torrijos B, Grande N, Bossu M, Gambarini G . Regenerative Endodontic Procedures Using Contemporary Endodontic Materials. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(6). PMC: 6471897. DOI: 10.3390/ma12060908. View

4.
Paul M, Mazumdar D, Vyavahare N, Baranwal A . Healing of the periapical lesion in posterior teeth with mineral trioxide aggregate using orthograde technique - Two case reports. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3(Suppl 2):S264-8. PMC: 3514935. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.101111. View

5.
Nagendrababu V, Gutmann J . Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: 
A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2016; 48(3):193-208. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a36894. View