Multicentre Positive Deviance Seminar to Generate Best Practice Recommendations to Reduce Anastomotic Leak and Length of Stay for Patients Undergoing Oesophagectomy

Overview

Journal BMJ Open Qual

Publisher BMJ Publishing Group

Specialty Health Services

Date 2023 Dec 19

PMID 38114245

Authors

Daniel Jones

Molly Gingrich

Caitlin Anstee

Sara Najmeh

Najib Safieddine

Gail Darling

Richard Malthaner

Christian Finley

Daniel G French

Lorenzo Ferri

Andrew Seely

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: We describe a novel process using positive deviance (PD) with the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons members, to identify perioperative best practice to minimise anastomotic leak (AL) and length of stay (LOS) following oesophagectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first National combination of level 1 evidence with expert opinion (ie, PD seminar) aimed at reducing AL and LOS in oesophageal surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that a multicentre National PD seminar is feasible, and could lead to the generation of best practices recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Methods: Adverse events, LOS and AL incidence/severity following oesophagectomy were prospectively collected from seven Canadian thoracic institutions using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system (2017-2020). Anonymised display of centre's data were presented, with identification of centres demonstrating PD. Surgeons from PD sites discussed principles of care, culminating in the consensus recommendations, anonymously rated by all (5-point Likert scale).

Results: Data from 795 esophagectomies were included, with 25 surgeons participating. Two centres were identified as having the lowest AL rates 44/395 (11.1%) (vs five centres 71/400 (17.8%) (p<0.01)) and shortest LOS 8 days 45 (IQR: 6-14) (vs 10 days (IQR: 8-18) (p<0.001)). Recommendations included preoperative (prehabilitation, smoking cessation, chemotherapy for patients with dysphagia, minimise stents/feeding tubes), intraoperative (narrow gastric conduit, intrathoracic anastomosis, avoid routine jejunostomy, use small diameter closed-suction drains), postoperative day (POD) (early (POD 2-3) enteral feeding initiation, avoid routine barium swallow studies, early removal of tubes/drains (POD 2-3)). All ranked above 80% (4/5) in agreement to implement recommendations into their practice.

Conclusion: We report the feasibility of a National multicentre PD seminar with the generation of best practice recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS following oesophagectomy. Further research is required to demonstrate whether National PD seminars can be an effective quality improvement tool.

References

Ivanovic J, Mostofian F, Anstee C, Gilbert S, Maziak D, Shamji F . Impact of Surgeon Self-evaluation and Positive Deviance on Postoperative Adverse Events After Non-cardiac Thoracic Surgery. J Healthc Qual. 2018; 40(4):e62-e70. DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000130. View

Hughes L, Sheard L, Pinkney L, Lawton R . Excellence in elective hip and knee surgery: what does it look like? A positive deviance approach. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019; 25(1):5-12. DOI: 10.1177/1355819619867350. View

Wishik S, Vynckt S . The use of nutritional 'positive deviants' to identify approaches for modification of dietary practices. Am J Public Health. 1976; 66(1):38-42. PMC: 1653353. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.66.1.38. View

Bradley E, Curry L, Ramanadhan S, Rowe L, Nembhard I, Krumholz H . Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:25. PMC: 2690576. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-25. View

Miller J, Jain M, de Gara C, Morgan D, Urschel J . Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1997; 65(1):20-1. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199705)65:1<20::aid-jso4>3.0.co;2-q. View

Verstegen M, Bouwense S, van Workum F, Broek R, Siersema P, Rovers M . Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg. 2019; 14:17. PMC: 6449949. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4. View

Marsh D, Schroeder D, Dearden K, Sternin J, Sternin M . The power of positive deviance. BMJ. 2004; 329(7475):1177-9. PMC: 527707. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1177. View

Schwulst S, Mazuski J . Surgical prophylaxis and other complication avoidance care bundles. Surg Clin North Am. 2012; 92(2):285-305, ix. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.01.011. View

Kwok E . Inadequacy of Current Morbidity and Mortality Review Activities: Evolution of a Time-Honored Tradition Needed. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017; 43(1):3-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.10.006. View

10.

Agzarian J, Visscher S, Knight A, Allen M, Cassivi S, Nichols 3rd F . The cost burden of clinically significant esophageal anastomotic leaks-a steep price to pay. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 157(5):2086-2092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.137. View

11.

Seely A, Ivanovic J, Threader J, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Shehab D, Ramsay T . Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90(3):936-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.014. View

12.

Finley C, Jacks L, Keshavjee S, Darling G . The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92(2):485-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089. View

13.

Birkmeyer J, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas F, Batista I . Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15):1128-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. View

14.

Tessier L, Guilcher S, Bai Y, Ng R, Wodchis W . The impact of hospital harm on length of stay, costs of care and length of person-centred episodes of care: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ. 2019; 191(32):E879-E885. PMC: 6690827. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181621. View

15.

McAleese P . The effect of complications on length of stay. Ann Surg. 1994; 220(6):740-4. PMC: 1234475. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00006. View

16.

Finley C, Bendzsak A, Tomlinson G, Keshavjee S, Urbach D, Darling G . The effect of regionalization on outcome in pulmonary lobectomy: a Canadian national study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140(4):757-63. PMC: 7094104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.040. View

17.

Marra A, Guastelli L, de Araujo C, dos Santos J, Lamblet L, Silva Jr M . Positive deviance: a new strategy for improving hand hygiene compliance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 31(1):12-20. DOI: 10.1086/649224. View

18.

Bates K, Yu S, Mangeot C, Shea J, Brown D, Uzark K . Identifying best practices in interstage care: using a positive deviance approach within the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative. Cardiol Young. 2019; 29(3):398-407. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951118002548. View

19.

Ivanovic J, Anstee C, Ramsay T, Gilbert S, Maziak D, Shamji F . Using Surgeon-Specific Outcome Reports and Positive Deviance for Continuous Quality Improvement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100(4):1188-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.012. View

20.

Backman C, Vanderloo S, Forster A . Measuring and improving quality in university hospitals in Canada: The Collaborative for Excellence in Healthcare Quality. Health Policy. 2016; 120(9):982-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.006. View