» Articles » PMID: 38113856

Non-pharmacological Rehabilitation Interventions for Individuals with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Lupus
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2023 Dec 19
PMID 38113856
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore what non-pharmacological interventions have been examined for individuals with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1983-Feb. 2023. Our scoping review included studies that examined non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with APS using patient-reported outcome measures. We excluded studies that reported physiological outcomes only.

Results: The review yielded one case study on the safety and efficacy of an exercise program for a 15-year-old male with secondary APS using physiological and patient-reported outcome measures. Despite the lack of evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with APS, one excluded study reported that individuals with APS want guidance about physical activity and exercise. We also found several types of potentially relevant non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with lupus, a disease that often co-occurs with APS.

Conclusions: Non-pharmacological interventions may offer a solution for addressing some non-thrombotic or non-obstetric APS symptoms, such as neurological, physical, and cognitive symptoms that are not well-controlled by anticoagulation. Due to the unique risks associated with APS, research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions, particularly those involving exercise. Adopting a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with APS and involving rehabilitation professionals, who are experts in the design and delivery of non-pharmacological interventions, may provide a foundation for developing and testing novel interventions that improve health outcomes while also fulfilling unmet needs reported by patients.

Citing Articles

Refractory generalized myasthenia gravis treated successfully with telitacicept: two cases report.

Zhang Z, Wang Z, Du X, Huang X, Zhang Y J Neurol. 2023; 271(1):584-588.

PMID: 37804335 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-12036-y.

References
1.
Williams E, Egede L, Faith T, Oates J . Effective Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Lupus: Potential Impact of Peer Mentoring. Am J Med Sci. 2017; 353(6):580-592. PMC: 6249683. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.01.011. View

2.
Rolving N, Brocki B, Andreasen J . Coping with everyday life and physical activity in the aftermath of an acute pulmonary embolism: A qualitative study exploring patients' perceptions and coping strategies. Thromb Res. 2019; 182:185-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.06.007. View

3.
Sammaritano L . Antiphospholipid syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019; 34(1):101463. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101463. View

4.
Pinto S, Yassin M, Galang G . Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Venous Doppler Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis at Admission to Inpatient Rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 97(10):747-753. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000961. View

5.
Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corra U, Davos C, Hansen D, Frederix I . Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 28(5):460-495. DOI: 10.1177/2047487320913379. View