» Articles » PMID: 38113279

Effects of Cattle on Vector-borne Disease Risk to Humans: A Systematic Review

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vector-borne pathogens (VBPs) causing vector-borne diseases (VBDs) can circulate among humans, domestic animals, and wildlife, with cattle in particular serving as an important source of exposure risk to humans. The close associations between humans and cattle can facilitate the transmission of numerous VBPs, impacting public health and economic security. Published studies demonstrate that cattle can influence human exposure risk positively, negatively, or have no effect. There is a critical need to synthesize the information in the scientific literature on this subject, in order to illuminate the various ecological mechanisms that can affect VBP exposure risk in humans. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to review the scientific literature, provide a synthesis of the possible effects of cattle on VBP risk to humans, and propose future directions for research. This study was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 extension guidelines for systematic review. After screening 470 peer-reviewed articles published between 1999-2019 using the databases Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed Central, CABI Global Health, and Google Scholar, and utilizing forward and backward search techniques, we identified 127 papers that met inclusion criteria. Results of the systematic review indicate that cattle can be beneficial or harmful to human health with respect to VBDs depending on vector and pathogen ecology and livestock management practices. Cattle can increase risk of exposure to infections spread by tsetse flies and ticks, followed by sandflies and mosquitoes, through a variety of mechanisms. However, cattle can have a protective effect when the vector prefers to feed on cattle instead of humans and when chemical control measures (e.g., acaricides/insecticides), semio-chemicals, and other integrated vector control measures are utilized in the community. We highlight that further research is needed to determine ways in which these mechanisms may be exploited to reduce VBD risk in humans.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive analysis of West Nile Virus transmission: Environmental, ecological, and individual factors. An umbrella review.

Vargas Campos C, Garcia-Perez S, Figuerola J, Martinez-de la Puente J, Polo I, Rodriguez-de-Fonseca B One Health. 2025; 20:100984.

PMID: 40040921 PMC: 11876902. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100984.


Molecular xenomonitoring reveals Anopheles funestus and An. rivulorum as the primary vectors of lymphatic filariasis in coastal Kenya.

Bartilol B, Babu L, Garama K, Karisa J, Kamau A, Mwandawiro C Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):425.

PMID: 39385178 PMC: 11462847. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06513-0.


Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of Subolesin anti-tick vaccine in Ugandan multi-site field trial.

Kabi F, Contreras M, Semakula J, Sanchez-Sanchez M, Munoz-Hernandez C, Mugerwa S NPJ Vaccines. 2024; 9(1):174.

PMID: 39294184 PMC: 11410822. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-024-00966-1.


Evolution of tick vaccinology.

de la Fuente J, Ghosh S Parasitology. 2024; 151(9):1045-1052.

PMID: 38586999 PMC: 11770523. DOI: 10.1017/S003118202400043X.


Assessing knowledge gaps and empowering Extension workers in Illinois with information on ticks and tickborne diseases through KAP surveys.

Chakraborty S, Kopsco H, Evans C, Mateus-Pinilla N, Smith R Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e25789.

PMID: 38352775 PMC: 10862665. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25789.

References
1.
Ghebreyesus T, Haile M, Witten K, Getachew A, Yohannes M, Lindsay S . Household risk factors for malaria among children in the Ethiopian highlands. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000; 94(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90424-3. View

2.
Selby R, Bardosh K, Picozzi K, Waiswa C, Welburn S . Cattle movements and trypanosomes: restocking efforts and the spread of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense sleeping sickness in post-conflict Uganda. Parasit Vectors. 2013; 6(1):281. PMC: 3851531. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-281. View

3.
Bouma M, Rowland M . Failure of passive zooprophylaxis: cattle ownership in Pakistan is associated with a higher prevalence of malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995; 89(4):351-3. DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90004-7. View

4.
Balasubramanian R, Yadav P, Sahina S, Arathy Nadh V . Distribution and prevalence of ticks on livestock population in endemic area of Kyasanur forest disease in Western Ghats of Kerala, South India. J Parasit Dis. 2019; 43(2):256-262. PMC: 6570721. DOI: 10.1007/s12639-019-01086-7. View

5.
Narladkar B . Projected economic losses due to vector and vector-borne parasitic diseases in livestock of India and its significance in implementing the concept of integrated practices for vector management. Vet World. 2018; 11(2):151-160. PMC: 5891867. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.151-160. View