» Articles » PMID: 38112828

Growing-season Carbon Budget of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem in the Qinghai Lake Basin: a Continued Carbon Sink Through This Century According to the Biome-BGC Model

Overview
Date 2023 Dec 19
PMID 38112828
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The alpine meadow is one of the most important ecosystems in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), and critically sensitive to climate change and human activities. Thus, it is crucial to precisely reveal the current state and predict future trends in the carbon budget of the alpine meadow ecosystem. The objective of this study was to explore the applicability of the Biome-BGC model (BBGC) in the Qinghai Lake Basin (QLB), identify the key parameters affecting the variation of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and further predict the future trends in carbon budget in the QLB.

Results: The alpine meadow mainly acted as carbon sink during the growing season. For the eco-physiological factors, the YEL (Yearday to end litterfall), YSNG (Yearday to start new growth), CLEC (Canopy light extinction coefficient), FRC:LC (New fine root C: new leaf C), SLA (Canopy average specific leaf area), C:N (C:N of leaves), and FLNR (Fraction of leaf N in Rubisco) were confirmed to be the top seven parameters affecting carbon budget of the alpine meadow. For the meteorological factors, the sensitivity of NEE to precipitation was greater than that to vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and it was greater to radiation than to air temperature. Moreover, the combined effect of two different meteorological factors on NEE was higher than the individual effect of each one. In the future, warming and wetting would enhance the carbon sink capacity of the alpine meadow during the growing season, but extreme warming (over 3.84 ℃) would reduce NEE (about 2.9%) in the SSP5-8.5 scenario.

Conclusion: Overall, the alpine meadow ecosystem in the QLB generally performs as a carbon sink at present and in the future. It is of great significance for the achievement of the goal of carbon neutrality and the management of alpine ecosystems.

References
1.
Sha Z, Wang Q, Wang J, Du J, Hu J, Ma Y . Regional environmental change and human activity over the past hundred years recorded in the sedimentary record of Lake Qinghai, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(10):9662-9674. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8327-0. View

2.
Liu J, Wu Z, Yang S, Yang C . Sensitivity Analysis of Biome-BGC for Gross Primary Production of a Rubber Plantation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21). PMC: 9654267. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114068. View

3.
Wang Y, Xiao J, Ma Y, Ding J, Chen X, Ding Z . Persistent and enhanced carbon sequestration capacity of alpine grasslands on Earth's Third Pole. Sci Adv. 2023; 9(20):eade6875. PMC: 10191437. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade6875. View

4.
Wang J, Feng L, Palmer P, Liu Y, Fang S, Bosch H . Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data. Nature. 2020; 586(7831):720-723. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2849-9. View

5.
Hikosaka K, Anten N, Borjigidai A, Kamiyama C, Sakai H, Hasegawa T . A meta-analysis of leaf nitrogen distribution within plant canopies. Ann Bot. 2016; 118(2):239-47. PMC: 4970363. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw099. View