» Articles » PMID: 38111837

Canadian Kidney Transplant Professionals' Perspectives on Precision Medicine and Molecular Matching in Kidney Allocation

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Dec 19
PMID 38111837
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection is an important cause of kidney transplant loss. A new strategy requiring application of precision medicine tools in transplantation considers molecular compatibility between donors and recipients and holds the promise of improved immunologic risk, preventing rejection and premature graft loss. The objective of this study was to gather Canadian transplant professionals' perspectives on molecular compatibility in kidney transplantation.

Methods: Seventeen Canadian transplant professionals (14 nephrologists, 2 nurses, and 1 surgeon) participated in semistructured interviews in 2021. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the qualitative description approach.

Results: Participants identified fair access to transplantation as the most important principle in kidney allocation. Molecular compatibility was viewed as a promising innovation. However, participants were concerned about increased waiting times, negative impact on some patients, and potential problems related to the adequacy of information explaining this new technology. To mitigate the challenges associated with molecular matching, participants suggested integrating a maximum waiting time for molecular-matched kidneys and expanding the program nationally/internationally.

Conclusions: Molecular matching in kidney transplantation is viewed as a promising technology for decreasing the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and improving graft survival. Further studies are needed to determine how to ethically integrate this technology into the kidney allocation algorithm.

Citing Articles

Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody Detection from Terasaki's Humoral Theory to Delisting Strategies in 2024.

San Segundo D, Comins-Boo A, Lopez-Hoyos M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859344 PMC: 11766285. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020630.

References
1.
Poses R, Isen A . Qualitative research in medicine and health care: questions and controversy. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13(1):32-8. PMC: 1496891. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00005.x. View

2.
Haririan A . Current status of the evaluation and management of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015; 24(6):576-81. DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000167. View

3.
Kim M, Martin S, Townsend K, Gabardi S . Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2014; 34(7):733-44. DOI: 10.1002/phar.1426. View

4.
Sypek M, Howell M, Howard K, Wong G, Duncanson E, Clayton P . Healthcare professional and community preferences in deceased donor kidney allocation: A best-worst scaling survey. Am J Transplant. 2021; 22(3):886-897. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16898. View

5.
Yeung M, Coates P, Kam-Tao Li P . Kidney Organ Allocation System: How to Be Fair. Semin Nephrol. 2022; 42(4):151274. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.09.002. View