The First Outbreak of African Swine Fever in Sweden: a Survey of Pig Farmers' Perceptions of Information Received, Risks, Biosecurity Measures and Future Prospects

Overview

Journal Acta Vet Scand

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Veterinary Medicine

Date 2023 Dec 19

PMID 38110953

Authors

Elisabeth Rajala

Hedvig Grondal

Susanna Sternberg Lewerin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: African swine fever (ASF), a viral hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs and wild boar with up to 100% case fatality, was confirmed in Swedish wild boar in September 2023. The responsible authorities launched a control programme to eradicate the infection. The aim of the current study was to understand (i) how Swedish pig farmers have perceived the information issued by authorities and other stakeholders since the discovery of ASF in wild boar, (ii) which risks they see for introducing the infection to their farm, (iii) what biosecurity measures they have taken on their farms, and (iv) their outlook on the future. Such information is important for evaluating the effectiveness of the early stages of ASF control in Sweden. A questionnaire was designed and distributed to members of the Swedish pig producers' organisation.

Results: A total of 155 farmers responded to the survey (response rate 36%). Almost all respondents had received general information about ASF (91%, n = 138), and 72% (n = 109) had received information about how they can protect their farm from ASF introduction. A majority (87%, n = 118) thought the information was easy to understand, 90% (n = 137) that is was relevant, and 77% (n = 117) that they currently did not lack any information. If given the resources necessary, 58% (n = 84) of the farmers would like to take additional measures such as fencing, and heavily reduce or eradicate the wild boar population. Wild boars were considered the greatest risk for introduction of ASF into their herd (39%, n = 57), followed by people (30%, n = 44), and transports (16%, n = 23). Many farmers (66%, n = 88) had a positive outlook on the future, and 89% (n = 127) have not changed their plans for the future since the ASF outbreak.

Conclusions: The responding farmers were in general satisfied with the information received in the beginning of the ASF outbreak. The majority have a positive outlook on the future and the outbreak has not caused them to change their plans. Actions that were highlighted as important to safeguard Sweden's pig production included measures to control the wild boar population.

Citing Articles

Enhancing infection control practices and biosecurity plans on Swedish pig farms: insights, challenges, and strategies.

Rajala E, Grondal H, Eriksson J, Lewerin S Acta Vet Scand. 2024; 66(1):48.

PMID: 39261945 PMC: 11391622. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-024-00771-9.

Genetic Characterization of African Swine Fever Italian Clusters in the 2022-2023 Epidemic Wave by a Multi-Gene Approach.

Giammarioli M, Torresi C, Biccheri R, Camma C, Marcacci M, Dondo A Viruses. 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 39205159 PMC: 11360507. DOI: 10.3390/v16081185.

Perceptions and practices of Swedish wild boar hunters in relation to African swine fever before the first outbreak in Sweden.

Chenais E, Ernholm L, Brunzell A, Mard K, Svensson L, Lindahl J BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):320.

PMID: 39020344 PMC: 11253465. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04183-9.

References

Penrith M . African swine fever. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009; 76(1):91-5. View

Pudenz C, Schulz L, Tonsor G . Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers. Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6:146. PMC: 6546718. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00146. View

Dione M, Dohoo I, Ndiwa N, Poole J, Ouma E, Amia W . Impact of participatory training of smallholder pig farmers on knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding biosecurity for the control of African swine fever in Uganda. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020; 67(6):2482-2493. PMC: 7754142. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13587. View

Licoppe A, De Waele V, Malengreaux C, Paternostre J, Van Goethem A, Desmecht D . Management of a Focal Introduction of ASF Virus in Wild Boar: The Belgian Experience. Pathogens. 2023; 12(2). PMC: 9961158. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020152. View

Bergmann H, Schulz K, Conraths F, Sauter-Louis C . A Review of Environmental Risk Factors for African Swine Fever in European Wild Boar. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(9). PMC: 8465043. DOI: 10.3390/ani11092692. View

Pietschmann J, Guinat C, Beer M, Pronin V, Tauscher K, Petrov A . Course and transmission characteristics of oral low-dose infection of domestic pigs and European wild boar with a Caucasian African swine fever virus isolate. Arch Virol. 2015; 160(7):1657-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-015-2430-2. View

Moya S, Tirado F, Espluga J, Ciaravino G, Armengol R, Dieguez J . Dairy farmers' decision-making to implement biosecurity measures: A study of psychosocial factors. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019; 67(2):698-710. PMC: 7079090. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13387. View

Rowlands R, Michaud V, Heath L, Hutchings G, Oura C, Vosloo W . African swine fever virus isolate, Georgia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(12):1870-4. PMC: 2634662. DOI: 10.3201/eid1412.080591. View

Klein L, Hessling-Zeinen S, Adler F, Gerdes U, Blome S, Beilage E . Exploring pig farmers' decision-making concerning biosecurity measures against African Swine Fever. Prev Vet Med. 2023; 217:105949. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105949. View

10.

Garforth C, Bailey A, Tranter R . Farmers' attitudes to disease risk management in England: a comparative analysis of sheep and pig farmers. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 110(3-4):456-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.02.018. View

11.

Renault V, Damiaans B, Humblet M, Jimenez Ruiz S, Garcia Bocanegra I, Brennan M . Cattle farmers' perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European-wide pilot study. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020; 68(6):3305-3319. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13935. View

12.

Ernholm L, Stahl K, Neimanis A, Widgren S, Sternberg-Lewerin S . Understanding the interface between European wild boar (Sus scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) in Sweden through a questionnaire study. Acta Vet Scand. 2023; 65(1):40. PMC: 10515417. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-023-00705-x. View

13.

Racicot M, Venne D, Durivage A, Vaillancourt J . Evaluation of the relationship between personality traits, experience, education and biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec, Canada. Prev Vet Med. 2011; 103(2-3):201-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.011. View

14.

Sorensen J, Edwards S, Noordhuizen J, Gunnarsson S . Animal production systems in the industrialised world. Rev Sci Tech. 2006; 25(2):493-503. View

15.

Sauter-Louis C, Schulz K, Richter M, Staubach C, Mettenleiter T, Conraths F . African swine fever: Why the situation in Germany is not comparable to that in the Czech Republic or Belgium. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021; 69(4):2201-2208. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14231. View

16.

Ellis-Iversen J, Cook A, Watson E, Nielen M, Larkin L, Wooldridge M . Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms. Prev Vet Med. 2009; 93(4):276-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.005. View

17.

Alarcon P, Wieland B, Mateus A, Dewberry C . Pig farmers' perceptions, attitudes, influences and management of information in the decision-making process for disease control. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 116(3):223-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.004. View

18.

Chenais E, Depner K, Guberti V, Dietze K, Viltrop A, Stahl K . Epidemiological considerations on African swine fever in Europe 2014-2018. Porcine Health Manag. 2019; 5:6. PMC: 6325717. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-018-0109-2. View

19.

Blome S, Franzke K, Beer M . African swine fever - A review of current knowledge. Virus Res. 2020; 287:198099. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198099. View