» Articles » PMID: 38110661

A Nomogram Model for Predicting 5-year Risk of Prediabetes in Chinese Adults

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Dec 19
PMID 38110661
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early identification is crucial to effectively intervene in individuals at high risk of developing pre-diabetes. This study aimed to create a personalized nomogram to determine the 5-year risk of pre-diabetes among Chinese adults. This retrospective cohort study included 184,188 participants without prediabetes at baseline. Training cohorts (92,177) and validation cohorts (92,011) were randomly assigned (92,011). We compared five prediction models on the training cohorts: full cox proportional hazards model, stepwise cox proportional hazards model, multivariable fractional polynomials (MFP), machine learning, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models. At the same time, we validated the above five models on the validation set. And we chose the LASSO model as the final risk prediction model for prediabetes. We presented the model with a nomogram. The model's performance was evaluated in terms of its discriminative ability, clinical utility, and calibration using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis, and calibration analysis on the training cohorts. Simultaneously, we also evaluated the above nomogram on the validation set. The 5-year incidence of prediabetes was 10.70% and 10.69% in the training and validation cohort, respectively. We developed a simple nomogram that predicted the risk of prediabetes by using the parameters of age, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and serum creatinine (Scr). The nomogram's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.7341 (95% CI 0.7290-0.7392) for the training cohort and 0.7336 (95% CI 0.7285-0.7387) for the validation cohort, indicating good discriminative ability. The calibration curve showed a perfect fit between the predicted prediabetes risk and the observed prediabetes risk. An analysis of the decision curve presented the clinical application of the nomogram, with alternative threshold probability spectrums being presented as well. A personalized prediabetes prediction nomogram was developed and validated among Chinese adults, identifying high-risk individuals. Doctors and others can easily and efficiently use our prediabetes prediction model when assessing prediabetes risk.

Citing Articles

Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict 1-year mortality risk in patients with HIV/AIDS undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

Xian Z, Song X, Wang Y, Yang T, Mao N Ren Fail. 2025; 47(1):2461665.

PMID: 39962711 PMC: 11837922. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2461665.


Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Identifying Prediabetes and Diabetes in Normoglycemia.

Zhang X, Yao W, Wang D, Hu W, Zhang G, Zhang Y Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024; 40(8):e70003.

PMID: 39497474 PMC: 11601146. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.70003.


Non-linear connection between the triglyceride-glucose index and prediabetes risk among Chinese adults: a secondary retrospective cohort study.

Cao C, Han Y, Deng H, Zhang X, Hu H, Zha F Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):529.

PMID: 39497216 PMC: 11536673. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02121-x.


Concentric-object and equiangular-object methods to perform standardized regional analysis in renal mpMRI.

Sanmiguel-Serpa L, De Visschere P, Pullens P MAGMA. 2024; 38(1):67-83.

PMID: 39427099 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01208-0.


Construction of a 3-year risk prediction model for developing diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes.

Yang J, Liu D, Du Q, Zhu J, Lu L, Wu Z Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1410502.

PMID: 38938520 PMC: 11208327. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1410502.


References
1.
Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P . Definition, Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes, Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018; 42 Suppl 1:S10-S15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003. View

2.
Tabak A, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner E, Kivimaki M . Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. Lancet. 2012; 379(9833):2279-90. PMC: 3891203. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9. View

3.
Papatheodorou K, Banach M, Bekiari E, Rizzo M, Edmonds M . Complications of Diabetes 2017. J Diabetes Res. 2018; 2018:3086167. PMC: 5866895. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3086167. View

4.
Wong T, Cheung C, Larsen M, Sharma S, Simo R . Diabetic retinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16012. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.12. View

5.
Zheng Y, Ley S, Hu F . Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 14(2):88-98. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. View