» Articles » PMID: 38109296

Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab in Patients With RAF/RAS-Wild-Type Glioblastoma: Results From the Drug Rediscovery Protocol

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of malignant primary high-grade brain tumors, predominantly glioblastomas, is poor despite intensive multimodality treatment options. In more than 50% of patients with glioblastomas, potentially targetable mutations are present, including rearrangements, altered splicing, and/or focal amplifications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by signaling through the RAF/RAS pathway. We studied whether treatment with the clinically available anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab provides clinical benefit for patients with RAF/RAS-wild-type (wt) glioblastomas in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).

Methods: Patients with progression of treatment refractory RAF/RASwt glioblastoma were included for treatment with panitumumab in DRUP when measurable according to RANO criteria. The primary endpoints of this study are clinical benefit (CB: defined as confirmed objective response [OR] or stable disease [SD] ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1 in 8 patients had CB in stage 1.

Results: Between 03-2018 and 02-2022, 24 evaluable patients were treated. CB was observed in 5 patients (21%), including 2 patients with partial response (8.3%) and 3 patients with SD ≥ 16 weeks (12.5%). After median follow-up of 15 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.7 months (95% CI 1.6-2.1 months) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-8.6 months), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed.

Conclusions: Panitumumab treatment provides limited CB in patients with recurrent RAF/RASwt glioblastoma precluding further development of this therapeutic strategy.

Citing Articles

Evolution of Molecular Biomarkers and Precision Molecular Therapeutic Strategies in Glioblastoma.

Jacome M, Wu Q, Pina Y, Etame A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518074 PMC: 11544870. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213635.

References
1.
Seystahl K, Wick W, Weller M . Therapeutic options in recurrent glioblastoma--An update. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 99:389-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.018. View

2.
Gan H, Parakh S, Lassman A, Seow A, Lau E, Lee S . Tumor volumes as a predictor of response to the anti-EGFR antibody drug conjugate depatuxizumab mafadotin. Neurooncol Adv. 2021; 3(1):vdab102. PMC: 8446913. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab102. View

3.
Kim J, Lee I, Cho H, Park C, Jung Y, Kim Y . Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Primary Glioblastoma Genome. Cancer Cell. 2015; 28(3):318-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.07.013. View

4.
Kreisl T, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I . Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 27(5):740-5. PMC: 2645088. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055. View

5.
Westphal M, Heese O, Steinbach J, Schnell O, Schackert G, Mehdorn M . A randomised, open label phase III trial with nimotuzumab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in the treatment of newly diagnosed adult glioblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(4):522-532. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.019. View