» Articles » PMID: 38109113

Local Treatment and Treatment-Related Adverse Effects Among Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Dec 18
PMID 38109113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Recent data suggest that local treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation may improve survival outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer. However, evidence is lacking on treatment-related adverse effects among men with advanced prostate cancer.

Objective: To assess the association of local treatment on treatment-related adverse effects among men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study assessed men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer (defined as T4, N1, and/or M1 prostate cancer) between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, with follow-up through December 31, 2021, who were treated at Veterans Health Administration medical centers.

Exposure: Local treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Main outcomes were treatment-related adverse effects, including constitutional, gastrointestinal, pain, sexual function, and urinary function conditions, at 3 intervals after initial treatment (≤1 year, >1 to ≤2 years, and >2 to ≤5 years) after initial treatment.

Results: This cohort study consisted of 5502 men (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [10.3] years) diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Of the cohort, 1705 men (31.0%) received local treatment. There was a high prevalence of adverse conditions in men receiving both local and nonlocal treatment, and these adverse conditions persisted for more than 2 years to 5 years or less after initial treatment. A total of 916 men (75.2%) with initial local treatment and 897 men (67.1%) with initial nonlocal treatment reported the presence of at least 1 adverse condition for more than 2 years to 5 years or less after initial treatment. In the first year, local treatment (vs nonlocal) was associated with adverse gastrointestinal (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.08; 95% CI, 3.06-5.45), pain (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.35-1.83), sexual (AOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.42-3.62), and urinary (AOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.90-2.66) conditions. Local treatment (without secondary treatment) remained significantly associated with adverse gastrointestinal (AOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.52-3.77), sexual (AOR, 3.36; 95% CI, 2.56-4.41), and urinary (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78) conditions at more than 2 years to 5 years or less after treatment.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cohort study of men with advanced prostate cancer, local treatment was associated with persistent treatment-related adverse effects across multiple domains. These results suggest that patients and clinicians should consider the adverse effects of local treatment when making treatment decisions in the setting of advanced prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

FOXA1-dependent PUS1 regulates EIF3b stability in a non-enzymatic pathway mediating prostate cancer bone metastasis.

Wu Y, Peng S, Cheng B, Zhong H, Cen M, Fu J Int J Biol Sci. 2024; 20(11):4566-4584.

PMID: 39247811 PMC: 11380452. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.100905.


Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform.

Lama D, Thomas K, Vernez S, Okunowo O, Lau C, Yuh B BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):72.

PMID: 38532371 PMC: 10964602. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01463-2.

References
1.
Jones R . Decisional Regret Among Men With Prostate Cancer: What Is Involved?. JAMA Oncol. 2021; 8(1):59-60. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5137. View

2.
Culp S, Schellhammer P, Williams M . Might men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer benefit from definitive treatment of the primary tumor? A SEER-based study. Eur Urol. 2013; 65(6):1058-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012. View

3.
Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Porres D . Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and low volume skeletal metastases: results of a feasibility and case-control study. J Urol. 2014; 193(3):832-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.089. View

4.
Antwi S, Everson T . Prognostic impact of definitive local therapy of the primary tumor in men with metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis: A population-based, propensity score analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014; 38(4):435-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.04.002. View

5.
Metcalfe M, Smaldone M, Lin D, Aparicio A, Chapin B . Role of radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: A review. Urol Oncol. 2017; 35(4):125-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.001. View