» Articles » PMID: 38106584

Clinical Practice Patterns in IgA Nephropathy: A Global Questionnaire-Based Survey

Overview
Journal Kidney Int Rep
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2023 Dec 18
PMID 38106584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) displays ethnic differences in disease phenotype. We aimed to examine how this common disease is managed worldwide.

Methods: An online 2-step questionnaire-based survey was conducted among nephrologists globally focusing on various management strategies used in IgAN.

Results: A total of 422 nephrologists responded to the initial survey and 339 to the follow-up survey. Of the nephrologists, 13.7% do not get MEST-C scores in biopsy reports; 97.2% of nephrologists use renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) / angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as initial treatment. Other supportive treatments commonly employed are fish oil (43.6%) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (48.6%) with regional differences. Immunosuppression is generally (92.4%) initiated when proteinuria >1 g/d persists for ≥3 months.Main considerations for initiating immunosuppression are level of proteinuria (87.9%), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (78.7%), lack of response to RAAS blockade (57.6%) and MEST-C score (64.9%). Corticosteroids (89.1%) are universally used as first-line immunosuppression; mycophenolate mofetil is commonly used in resistant patients (49.3%). Only 30.4% nephrologist enroll patients with persistent proteinuria >1 g/d in clinical trials. Nephrologists in Europe (63.6%), North America (56.5%), and Australia (63.6%) are more likely to do so compared to South America (31.3%) and Asia (17.2%). Only 8.1% nephrologists in lower-middle income countries (LMICs) enroll patients in clinical trials, though 40% of them are aware of such trials in their nations.

Conclusion: Although most nephrologists agree on common parameters to assess clinical severity of IgAN, use of RAAS blockade, and blood pressure control, there is heterogeneity in use of other supportive therapies and initiation of immunosuppression. There is reluctance to enroll patients in clinical trials with novel treatments, principally in LMICs.

References
1.
Kunter U, Seikrit C, Floege J . Novel agents for treating IgA nephropathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2023; 32(5):418-426. DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000902. View

2.
Yagi K, Okada M, Yanagida H, Kuwajima H, Ikeda M, Sugimoto K . Comparison of antiproteinuric effects of two different combination therapies in children with IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004; 7(4):270-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-003-0255-x. View

3.
Currie G, Taylor A, Fujita T, Ohtsu H, Lindhardt M, Rossing P . Effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on proteinuria and progression of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17(1):127. PMC: 5015203. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0337-0. View

4.
Mulder N, Zass L, Hamdi Y, Othman H, Panji S, Allali I . African Global Representation in Biomedical Sciences. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2021; 4:57-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102920-112550. View

5.
Selvaskandan H, Cheung C, Muto M, Barratt J . New strategies and perspectives on managing IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2019; 23(5):577-588. PMC: 6469670. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-019-01700-1. View