» Articles » PMID: 38101848

Point-of-care Haemoglobin Accuracy and Transfusion Outcomes in Non-cardiac Surgery at a Canadian Tertiary Academic Hospital: Protocol for the PREMISE Observational Study

Abstract

Introduction: Transfusions in surgery can be life-saving interventions, but inappropriate transfusions may lack clinical benefit and cause harm. Transfusion decision-making in surgery is complex and frequently informed by haemoglobin (Hgb) measurement in the operating room. Point-of-care testing for haemoglobin (POCT-Hgb) is increasingly relied on given its simplicity and rapid provision of results. POCT-Hgb devices lack adequate validation in the operative setting, particularly for Hgb values within the transfusion zone (60-100 g/L). This study aims to examine the accuracy of intraoperative POCT-Hgb instruments in non-cardiac surgery, and the association between POCT-Hgb measurements and transfusion decision-making.

Methods And Analysis: PREMISE is an observational prospective method comparison study. Enrolment will occur when adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery require POCT-Hgb, as determined by the treating team. Three concurrent POCT-Hgb results, considered as index tests, will be compared with a laboratory analysis of Hgb (lab-Hgb), considered the gold standard. Participants may have multiple POCT-Hgb measurements during surgery. The primary outcome is the difference in individual Hgb measurements between POCT-Hgb and lab-Hgb, primarily among measurements that are within the transfusion zone. Secondary outcomes include POCT-Hgb accuracy within the entire cohort, postoperative morbidity, mortality and transfusion rates. The sample size is 1750 POCT-Hgb measurements to obtain a minimum of 652 Hgb measurements <100 g/L, based on an estimated incidence of 38%. The sample size was calculated to fit a logistic regression model to predict instances when POCT-Hgb are inaccurate, using 4 g/L as an acceptable margin of error.

Ethics And Dissemination: Institutional ethics approval has been obtained by the Ottawa Health Science Network-Research Ethics Board prior to initiating the study. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant scientific conferences. Social media will be leveraged to further disseminate the study results and engage with clinicians.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of point-of-care haemoglobin measurement accuracy in surgery (PREMISE) and implications for transfusion practice: a prospective cohort study.

Brousseau K, Monette L, McIsaac D, Wherrett C, Mallick R, Workneh A Br J Anaesth. 2025; 134(2):341-349.

PMID: 39794232 PMC: 11775836. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.033.

References
1.
Shan G . Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020; 29(10):3006-3018. DOI: 10.1177/0962280220913971. View

2.
Dolscheid-Pommerich R, Dolscheid S, Grigutsch D, Stoffel-Wagner B, Graeff I . Comparability of Point-of-Care versus Central Laboratory Hemoglobin Determination in Emergency Patients at a Supra-Maximal Care Hospital. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0166521. PMC: 5120806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166521. View

3.
Yip P, Venner A, Shea J, Fuezery A, Huang Y, Massicotte L . Point-of-care testing: A position statement from the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Clin Biochem. 2018; 53:156-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.015. View

4.
Bennett S, Tinmouth A, McIsaac D, English S, Hebert P, Karanicolas P . Ottawa Criteria for Appropriate Transfusions in Hepatectomy: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(4):766-774. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002205. View

5.
Johnston A, Bourner G, Martin T, McFarlane A, Good D, Padmore R . Guidance for quality control practices and precision goals for CBCs based on IQMH patterns-of-practice survey. Int J Lab Hematol. 2018; 41(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12915. View