[Influence of Cavity Design on Quality of Margin and Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of All-ceramic CAD/CAM Inlays]

Overview

Journal Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Dec 15

PMID 38101796

Authors

Si Ming Zhao

Xiao Yan Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of 135° and 90° cavity design on quality of margin and marginal adaptation and microleakage of all-ceramic computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) inlays.

Methods: One hundred extracted human molars were prepared by criteria of buccal occlusal (BO) inlay. On the buccal, the mesial margin was prepared as 135° bevel while the distal margin was prepared as butt-joint. All-ceramic restorations were made in the Sirona CEREC AC CAD/CAM system with VitaBlocs Mark Ⅱ, Upcera UP.CAD, IPS e.max CAD, Upcera Hyramic and Lava Ultimate. The gaps between each inlay's mesial margin-abutment and distal margin-abutment were recorded under an optical microscope. Each inlay was adhered to the abutment and aged by thermal cycling for 10 000 times. Each specimen was cut into 3 slices after staining. Dye penetration was evaluated under an optical microscope for mesial and distal margins.

Results: Mean marginal integrity rate, mean marginal gap value and mean depth of microleakage of 135° margin of Group Upcera Hyramic and Lava Ultimate were significantly better than those of Group VitaBlocs Mark Ⅱ, Upcera UP.CAD and IPS e.max CAD( < 0.05). Mean marginal gap value, mean depth of microleakage and scale of mean depth of microleakage of 90° margin of Group Upcera Hyramic and Lava Ultimate were significantly better than those of Group Upcera UP.CAD and IPS e.max CAD ( < 0.05) while mean marginal integrity rate was not significantly different (>0.05). Mean marginal integrity rate of 90° margin was significantly better than that of 135° margin in each group ( < 0.05) while mean depth of microleakage between different margins was not significantly different in each group (>0.05). Mean marginal gap value of 90° margin of Group VitaBlocs Mark Ⅱ and IPS e.max CAD was significantly better than that of 135° margin ( < 0.05) while there was not significant difference in other 3 groups between 90° and 135° margin (>0.05). Scale of mean depth of microleakage of 135° margin of Group Upcera Hyramic and Lava Ultimate was significant better than that of 90° margin ( < 0.05) while there was not significantly different in other 3 groups between 90° and 135° margin (>0.05).

Conclusion: The mesial and distal margins of abutement of all-ceramic inlay should be prepared as butt-joint.

References

Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O . Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110(6):447-454.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003. View

Oliveira J, Dorado L, Koch D, Scur A, Barbosa A . Marginal microleakage in cavities prepared with CVD tip and 245 bur. Dent Implantol Update. 2009; 20(3):17-23. View

Schroeder M, Reis A, Luque-Martinez I, Loguercio A, Masterson D, Maia L . Effect of enamel bevel on retention of cervical composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43(7):777-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.017. View

Baldi A, Comba A, Michelotto Tempesta R, Carossa M, Pereira G, Valandro L . External Marginal Gap Variation and Residual Fracture Resistance of Composite and Lithium-Silicate CAD/CAM Overlays after Cyclic Fatigue over Endodontically-Treated Molars. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(17). PMC: 8434150. DOI: 10.3390/polym13173002. View

. [Expert consensus on clinical application of all-ceramic esthetic restorative materials]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 54(12):825-828. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.12.007. View

Lima F, Neto C, Rubo J, Santos Jr G, Santos M . Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120(3):396-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.010. View

Gold S, Ferracane J, da Costa J . Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns. J Prosthodont. 2017; 27(1):63-66. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12638. View

Simi B, Suprabha B . Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14(2):178-81. PMC: 3146113. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.82631. View

Azeem R, Sureshbabu N . Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21(1):2-9. PMC: 5852929. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_213_16. View

10.

Frankenberger R, Hartmann V, Krech M, Kramer N, Reich S, Braun A . Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18(1):9-20. View

11.

Oz F, Bolay S, Canatan S . A clinical evaluation of resin nanoceramic CEREC Omnicam restorations associated with several factors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 33(4):583-589. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12691. View

12.

Dioguardi M, Alovisi M, Troiano G, Caponio C, Baldi A, Rocca G . Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non-vital teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(12):6597-6621. PMC: 8602142. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04187-x. View

13.

Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D . Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 121(4):590-597.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006. View

14.

Taha D, Spintzyk S, Sabet A, Wahsh M, Salah T . Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30(4):319-328. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12396. View