» Articles » PMID: 38099716

The Inaugural Junior Editorial Board-lessons Learned and the Path Forward Toward Improving the Peer Review Process

Overview
Journal mBio
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Dec 15
PMID 38099716
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inaugural Junior Editorial Board (JEB) of consisted of 64 early-career researchers active from 2022 to 2023. The goal of the JEB was to train early-career researchers in the art of peer review under the guidance of experienced editors. JEB members gained hands-on experience in peer review by participating in modules detailing the publishing process through the lenses of the journal, editor, and reviewer. Ultimately, JEB members applied this new knowledge by reviewing manuscripts. Here, we summarize the background, the mission, and the achievements of the first JEB. We also include possible trajectories for the future editions of this important program.

Citing Articles

The Early-Career Editorial Board Reviewer Training Program: cultivating excellence in peer review.

Casadevall A, Miles M, Day M, Donaldson A mBio. 2024; 15(7):e0176324.

PMID: 38874409 PMC: 11253583. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01763-24.

References
1.
Houry D, Green S, Callaham M . Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12:83. PMC: 3494517. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-83. View

2.
Dance A . Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off. Nature. 2023; 614(7948):581-583. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00403-8. View

3.
McDowell G, Knutsen J, Graham J, Oelker S, Lijek R . Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6822987. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.48425. View

4.
Gewin V . Junior researchers are losing out by ghostwriting peer reviews. Nature. 2020; . DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01533-8. View

5.
Dance A . Why early-career researchers should step up to the peer-review plate. Nature. 2022; 602(7895):169-171. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-00216-1. View