» Articles » PMID: 38096148

Acceptability of a Community-embedded Intervention for Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in South-east Nigeria: A Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Dec 14
PMID 38096148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents have limited access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services that are key to healthy sexual lives in many low and middle-income countries such as Nigeria. Hence, context-specific interventions are required to increase adolescents' access to and utilisation of SRH. This paper provides new knowledge on the acceptability of a community-embedded intervention to improve access to SRH information and services for adolescents in Ebonyi state, southeast Nigeria.

Methods: A community-embedded intervention was implemented for six months in selected communities. Thereafter the intervention was assessed for its acceptability using a total of 30 in-depth interviews and 18 focus group discussions conducted with policymakers, health service providers, school teachers, community gatekeepers, parents and adolescents who were purposively selected as relevant stakeholders on adolescent SRH. The interview transcripts were coded in NVivo 12 using a coding framework structured according to four key constructs of the theoretical framework for acceptability (TFA): affective attitude, intervention coherence, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. The outputs of the coded transcripts were analysed, and the emergent themes from each of the four constructs of the TFA were identified.

Results: The intervention was acceptable to the stakeholders, from the findings of its positive effects, appropriateness, and positive impact on sexual behaviour. Policymakers were happy to be included in collaborating with multiple stakeholders to co-create multi-faceted interventions relevant to their work (positive affective attitude). The stakeholders understood how the interventions work and perceived them as appropriate at individual and community levels, with adequate and non-complex tools adaptable to different levels of stakeholders (intervention coherence). The intervention promoted mutualistic relations across stakeholders and sectors, including creating multiple platforms to reach the target audience, positive change in sexual behaviour, and cross-learning among policymakers, community gatekeepers, service providers, and adolescents (intervention effectiveness), which empowered them to have the confidence to provide and access SRH information and services (self-efficacy).

Conclusions: Community-embedded interventions were acceptable as strong mechanisms for improving adolescents' access to SRH in the communities. Policymakers should promote the community-embedded strategy for holistic health promotion of adolescents.

Citing Articles

Unveiling barriers to reproductive health awareness among rural adolescents: a systematic review.

Wahyuningsih S, Widati S, Praveena S, Azkiya M Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1444111.

PMID: 39628795 PMC: 11611845. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1444111.

References
1.
Desrosiers A, Betancourt T, Kergoat Y, Servilli C, Say L, Kobeissi L . A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):666. PMC: 7216726. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08818-y. View

2.
Sommer M, Torondel B, Hennegan J, Phillips-Howard P, Mahon T, Motivans A . How addressing menstrual health and hygiene may enable progress across the Sustainable Development Goals. Glob Health Action. 2021; 14(1):1920315. PMC: 8253211. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1920315. View

3.
Odimba S, Squires F, Ferenchick E, Mbola Mbassi S, Chick P, Plesons M . A collaborative learning approach to improving health worker performance in adolescent sexual and reproductive health service provision: a descriptive feasibility study in six health zones in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Glob Health Action. 2021; 14(1):1985228. PMC: 8567869. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1985228. View

4.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis J . Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):88. PMC: 5267473. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8. View

5.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Lawes-Wickwar S, McBain H, Ezra D, Newman S . Does prospective acceptability of an intervention influence refusal to participate in a randomised controlled trial? An interview study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021; 21:100698. PMC: 7840848. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100698. View