» Articles » PMID: 38090797

Comparison of Polysomnography, Single-Channel Electroencephalogram, Fitbit, and Sleep Logs in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders: Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2023 Dec 13
PMID 38090797
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sleep disturbances are core symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Although various sleep measures have been developed to assess sleep patterns and quality of sleep, the concordance of these measures in patients with psychiatric disorders remains relatively elusive.

Objective: This study aims to examine the degree of agreement among 3 sleep recording methods and the consistency between subjective and objective sleep measures, with a specific focus on recently developed devices in a population of individuals with psychiatric disorders.

Methods: We analyzed 62 participants for this cross-sectional study, all having data for polysomnography (PSG), Zmachine, Fitbit, and sleep logs. Participants completed questionnaires on their symptoms and estimated sleep duration the morning after the overnight sleep assessment. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate the consistency between sleep parameters obtained from each instrument. Additionally, Bland-Altman plots were used to visually show differences and limits of agreement for sleep parameters measured by PSG, Zmachine, Fitbit, and sleep logs.

Results: The findings indicated a moderate agreement between PSG and Zmachine data for total sleep time (ICC=0.46; P<.001), wake after sleep onset (ICC=0.39; P=.002), and sleep efficiency (ICC=0.40; P=.006). In contrast, Fitbit demonstrated notable disagreement with PSG (total sleep time: ICC=0.08; wake after sleep onset: ICC=0.18; sleep efficiency: ICC=0.10) and exhibited particularly large discrepancies from the sleep logs (total sleep time: ICC=-0.01; wake after sleep onset: ICC=0.05; sleep efficiency: ICC=-0.02). Furthermore, subjective and objective concordance among PSG, Zmachine, and sleep logs appeared to be influenced by the severity of the depressive symptoms and obstructive sleep apnea, while these associations were not observed between the Fitbit and other sleep instruments.

Conclusions: Our study results suggest that Fitbit accuracy is reduced in the presence of comorbid clinical symptoms. Although user-friendly, Fitbit has limitations that should be considered when assessing sleep in patients with psychiatric disorders.

Citing Articles

Developing a Sleep Algxorithm to Support a Digital Medicine System: Noninterventional, Observational Sleep Study.

Cochran J JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e62959.

PMID: 39727095 PMC: 11683743. DOI: 10.2196/62959.

References
1.
Cook J, Eftekari S, Dallmann E, Sippy M, Plante D . Ability of the Fitbit Alta HR to quantify and classify sleep in patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence: A comparison against polysomnography. J Sleep Res. 2018; 28(4):e12789. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12789. View

2.
Wulff K, Dijk D, Middleton B, Foster R, Joyce E . Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 200(4):308-16. PMC: 3317037. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.096321. View

3.
Nierenberg A, Husain M, Trivedi M, Fava M, Warden D, Wisniewski S . Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with citalopram and risk of relapse: a STAR*D report. Psychol Med. 2009; 40(1):41-50. PMC: 5886713. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291709006011. View

4.
Byun J, Kim K, Moon H, Motamedi G, Cho Y . The first night effect during polysomnography, and patients' estimates of sleep quality. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 274:27-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.011. View

5.
Svensson T, Chung U, Tokuno S, Nakamura M, Svensson A . A validation study of a consumer wearable sleep tracker compared to a portable EEG system in naturalistic conditions. J Psychosom Res. 2019; 126:109822. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109822. View