» Articles » PMID: 38089600

Effects of Historical Inequity and Institutional Power on Cannabis Research: Moving Toward Equity and Inclusion

Overview
Journal PNAS Nexus
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Dec 13
PMID 38089600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Given historical inequities in cannabis laws and policies, there is an obligation on the part of researchers and policy makers to actively work toward improving equity in cannabis research at a time when the field is rapidly expanding. We wish to propose a way forward for cannabis research that acknowledges this history of discrimination and misuse of institutional power and embraces equity and inclusion. This article provides a brief perspective on historical drug policy, recent legalization trends that have disproportionately benefitted some groups over others, and the repercussions of those trends for the cannabis research enterprise. In addition, it proposes five key actions in both policy and research domains that are necessary to move the field of cannabis research, and perhaps biomedical research in substance use more broadly, forward in a productive and inclusionary way. Specifically, recommendations focus on equity-focused legislation and policy, supporting the entry and retention of scientists of color into the field, engaging in more ethical research practices, and practicing intentionally inclusive recruitment of participants will help to move the field of cannabis research forward. These efforts will ensure that scientific gains are shared equitably moving forward.

References
1.
Zuardi A . History of cannabis as a medicine: a review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2006; 28(2):153-7. DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462006000200015. View

2.
Balls-Berry J, Acosta-Perez E . The Use of Community Engaged Research Principles to Improve Health: Community Academic Partnerships for Research. P R Health Sci J. 2017; 36(2):84-85. PMC: 5582944. View

3.
Rella J . Recreational cannabis use: pleasures and pitfalls. Cleve Clin J Med. 2015; 82(11):765-72. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.82a.14073. View

4.
Hardy L, Hughes A, Hulen E, Figueroa A, Evans C, Begay R . Hiring the experts: best practices for community-engaged research. Qual Res. 2016; 16(5):592-600. PMC: 5100673. DOI: 10.1177/1468794115579474. View

5.
Selker H, Wilkins C . From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science. J Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 1(1):5-6. PMC: 6798217. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. View