» Articles » PMID: 38088124

[Multiple PCR for Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Management at Albacete University Hospital]

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Dec 13
PMID 38088124
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MRE) are a public health threat, with screening and isolation strategies being important to stop its dissemination. Multiplex PCR is a novel method capable of rapid diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity. In this study, our objective was to evaluate its application to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae management since its implementation in our hospital.

Methods: An observational retrospective descriptive study of multiplex PCR ALLPLEX TM ENTERO-DR results to screen inpatients colonized by MRE took place from November 2019 to May 2021. We calculated the percentage of positive, negative, non-identifiable or invalid results, identified microorganisms, reason for requesting it and subsequent actions. Median and I.R. from sampling time to partial and theoretical culture time, and since last colonization/infection depending on test results were calculated.

Results: Resistance mechanisms were detected in 31.47% of tests, being E. coli ESBL (68.99%) the most frequently isolated microorganism. Median time to partial result was 5.75 hours (I.R.: 2.67), having statistically significant differences with theoretical time. The most important reason to request the test was screening (80.12%) and the most frequent action taken was not to isolate (41.70 %). Whenever forty-nine months or more since last colonization/infection have passed, only 14.81% of the samples tested positive.

Conclusions: Multiplex PCR is a useful test to manage colonized patients, capable of giving a rapid result and allowing for quicker decision-making, contributing to a good use of resources and patient comfort.

References
1.
Oteo J, Bou G, Chaves F, Oliver A . Microbiological methods for surveillance of carrier status of multiresistant bacteria. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2016; 35(10):667-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.12.013. View

2.
Lau A, Fahle G, Kemp M, Jassem A, Dekker J, Frank K . Clinical Performance of Check-Direct CPE, a Multiplex PCR for Direct Detection of bla(KPC), bla(NDM) and/or bla(VIM), and bla(OXA)-48 from Perirectal Swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53(12):3729-37. PMC: 4652088. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01921-15. View

3.
Vasoo S, Cunningham S, Kohner P, Mandrekar J, Lolans K, Hayden M . Rapid and direct real-time detection of blaKPC and blaNDM from surveillance samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51(11):3609-15. PMC: 3889741. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01731-13. View

4.
Nordmann P, Gniadkowski M, Giske C, Poirel L, Woodford N, Miriagou V . Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18(5):432-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03815.x. View

5.
Landelle C, Pagani L, Harbarth S . Is patient isolation the single most important measure to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens?. Virulence. 2013; 4(2):163-71. PMC: 3654617. DOI: 10.4161/viru.22641. View