» Articles » PMID: 38084370

COVID-19 Emergency: the Influence of Implicit Attitudes, Information Sources, and Individual Characteristics on Psychological Distress, Intentions to Get Vaccinated, and Compliance with Restrictive Rules

Overview
Publisher Termedia
Date 2023 Dec 12
PMID 38084370
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To limit the spread of the COVID-19 emergency, a massive vaccination program was implemented and restrictive measures were imposed on the population. However, the propensity to adhere to the vaccination program has struggled to take off. Moreover, complying with the restrictive rules and maintaining social distancing have been highly distressing for many individuals.

Participants And Procedure: Italian participants ( = 140, females = 65%, mean age = 29.50, = 10.80) were presented with an online survey consisting of multiple-choice questions and two single-category implicit association tests (SC-IATs). One SC-IAT evaluated the tendency of participants to automatically associate personal protective equipment (PPE) and vaccines with or ; the other evaluated their tendency to automatically associate social situations with or . Multiple-choice questions explored individual, social, and environmental factors that were expected to contribute to vaccine propensity, compliance with restrictive rules, and feelings of distress.

Results: Using scientific information sources was related to implicitly associating PPE and vaccines with safety, which in turn was associated with the propensity to get the vaccine. Moreover, being female, young, unsatisfied with social relationships, having suffered health and economic consequences due to the pandemic, and having negative implicit attitudes toward social situations contributed to increasing feelings of distress.

Conclusions: Communication may contribute to individuals' behavior and preferences and it can also be associated with implicit attitudes, becoming consequently one of the main leverages to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Recovery programs should prioritize the development of interventions aimed at fostering psychological well-being through the enhancement of social contacts.

Citing Articles

Fear of COVID-19, intolerance of uncertainty, psychological capital, and positive future expectations: Tests of mediating relationships with healthcare workers.

Yildirim M, Cagis Z, Williams G Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2023; 45:158-163.

PMID: 37544692 PMC: 10290176. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2023.06.016.


Development of a scale for capturing psychological aspects of physical-digital integration: relationships with psychosocial functioning and facial emotion recognition.

Colledani D, Anselmi P, Robusto E AI Soc. 2023; :1-13.

PMID: 37358941 PMC: 10031718. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-023-01646-9.

References
1.
Giuntella O, Hyde K, Saccardo S, Sadoff S . Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(9). PMC: 7936339. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016632118. View

2.
Yildirim M, Guler A . Coronavirus anxiety, fear of COVID-19, hope and resilience in healthcare workers: a moderated mediation model study. Health Psychol Rep. 2023; 9(4):338-397. PMC: 10687536. DOI: 10.5114/hpr.2021.107336. View

3.
Veronese G, Mahamid F, Bdier D, Pancake R . Stress of COVID-19 and mental health outcomes in Palestine: the mediating role of well-being and resilience. Health Psychol Rep. 2023; 9(4):389-410. PMC: 10687527. DOI: 10.5114/hpr.2021.104490. View

4.
Mallinas S, Maner J, Plant E . What factors underlie attitudes regarding protective mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic?. Pers Individ Dif. 2021; 181:111038. PMC: 8164375. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111038. View

5.
Batra K, Singh T, Sharma M, Batra R, Schvaneveldt N . Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23). PMC: 7730003. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239096. View