» Articles » PMID: 38082011

Clinical Application of Super-low-positioned Intestinal Decompression Tube in the Treatment of Intestinal Obstruction: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Dec 11
PMID 38082011
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application and efficacy of a super-low-positioned intestinal decompression tube in the treatment of intestinal obstruction.

Methods: A total of 130 patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction were included in this study. The patients were divided into a super-low-positioned intestinal decompression group and a conventional intestinal decompression group. The clinical data, treatment outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The technical success rate of placing the super-low-positioned intestinal decompression tube was 100%, with no intraoperative complications. The patients in the super-low-positioned intestinal decompression group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (8.3 ± 5.2 vs 17.7 ± 13.3, P < 0.001) and a higher non-operative treatment success rate (83.6% vs 57.9%, P = 0.001) compared to the conventional intestinal decompression group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the placement of a super-low-positioned intestinal decompression tube was an independent protective factor for treatment outcomes (P = 0.001). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the super-low-positioned intestinal decompression group compared to the conventional group in both successful non-operative treatment patients (6.9 ± 3.0 vs 11.2 ± 7.5, P < 0.001) and failed non-operative treatment patients (16.2 ± 7.4 vs 26.6 ± 14.4, P < 0.001). The super-low-positioned intestinal decompression tube effectively relieved the "Self-strangulation" phenomenon in patients with intestinal obstruction.

Conclusion: The super-low-positioned intestinal decompression tube is a safe and effective method for the treatment of intestinal obstruction, with better treatment outcomes and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional intestinal decompression. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

References
1.
Guo S, Duan Z . Decompression of the small bowel by endoscopic long-tube placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(15):1822-6. PMC: 3332297. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i15.1822. View

2.
Gowen G . Rapid resolution of small-bowel obstruction with the long tube, endoscopically advanced into the jejunum. Am J Surg. 2007; 193(2):184-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.005. View

3.
Li M, Ren J, Zhu W, Li Y, Zhao Y, Jiang J . Long intestinal tube splinting really prevents recurrence of postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction: a study of 1,071 cases. Am J Surg. 2015; 209(2):289-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.027. View

4.
Ten Broek R, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Biffl W, Ansaloni L . Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2018; 13:24. PMC: 6006983. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0185-2. View

5.
Klingbeil K, Wu J, Osuna-Garcia A, Livingston E . Management of small bowel obstruction and systematic review of treatment without nasogastric tube decompression. Surg Open Sci. 2023; 12:62-67. PMC: 10040372. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.10.002. View