Patient Perspectives on Selecting an Academic Aesthetic Surgeon: A Qualitative Analysis

Overview

Journal Ann Plast Surg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2023 Dec 11

PMID 38079315

Authors

Shirley Chen

Benjamin C Park

Alan T Makhoul

Galen Perdikis

Catherine M Hammack-Aviran

Brian C Drolet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Growth of the aesthetic surgery marketplace has increased patient choice in provider selection. This study aimed to characterize how patients choose an aesthetic surgeon, identify knowledge gaps in this decision-making process, and understand why patients select academic aesthetic surgeons.

Methods: A qualitative interview study of aesthetic surgery patients from an academic center was conducted. Purposive sampling maximized representation regarding surgeon, surgery type, and patient demographics. An interview guide was developed in collaboration with content and methodology experts, then refined through pilot testing. Emergent themes were identified using a codebook constructed by grounded theory.

Results: Thematic saturation was achieved with 24 patients. When selecting a surgeon, participants valued bedside manner (24 of 24) and past patients' satisfaction (18 of 24). Most participants (16 of 24) ascribed low importance to board certification. Reasons given for choosing an academic practice included the institution's reputation (13 of 24) and the availability of medical records and other specialties if complications arise (8 of 24). Participants demonstrated knowledge gaps regarding medical training and licensure. No participant (0 of 24) was aware that any licensed physician can offer aesthetic surgery, and nearly all participants (23 of 24) expressed discomfort with this.

Conclusions: Patients prioritize subjective elements when selecting an aesthetic surgeon, relying less on objective and meaningful qualifications like board certification and training background. Academic aesthetic practice is valued because of reputation and ability to function as a medical home. Given the lack of public understanding regarding physician training, initiatives promoting transparency are needed to ensure that patients can make safe, informed decisions.

References

Barr J, Sinno S, Cimino M, Saadeh P . Clinicians performing cosmetic surgery in the community: a nationwide analysis of physician certification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 135(1):92e-98e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000774. View

Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles M . What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(10):1229-45. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903194015. View

Sorice S, Li A, Gilstrap J, Canales F, Furnas H . Social Media and the Plastic Surgery Patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(5):1047-1056. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003769. View

Perdikis G, Eaves F, Glassman G, Walker S, Huang L, Mast B . Aesthetic Surgery in Plastic Surgery Academia. Aesthet Surg J. 2020; 41(7):829-841. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa181. View

Shah A, Patel A, Smetona J, Rohrich R . Public Perception of Cosmetic Surgeons versus Plastic Surgeons: Increasing Transparency to Educate Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139(2):544e-557e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003020. View

Waltzman J, Scholz T, Evans G . What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 66(6):643-7. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181e19eeb. View

Fan K, Graziano F, Economides J, Black C, Song D . The Public's Preferences on Plastic Surgery Social Media Engagement and Professionalism: Demystifying the Impact of Demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(2):619-630. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005205. View

Cho M, Li A, Furnas H, Rohrich R . Current Trends in the Use of Social Media by Plastic Surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146(1):83e-91e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006936. View

Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, Otte M . The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015; 39(2):270-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3. View

10.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

11.

Wong W, Camp M, Camp J, Gupta S . The quality of Internet advertising in aesthetic surgery: an in-depth analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2010; 30(5):735-43. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X10381987. View

12.

Hemal K, Cignetti N, Newsom M, David L . Consumer Awareness and Comfort with Resident-run Cosmetic Clinics: A Crowdsourcing Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(7):e3681. PMC: 8274800. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003681. View

13.

Levin L . The business of academic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126(1):303-307. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc0af. View

14.

Galanis C, Sanchez I, Roostaeian J, Crisera C . Factors influencing patient interest in plastic surgery and the process of selecting a surgeon. Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33(4):585-90. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X13481228. View

15.

Darisi T, Thorne S, Iacobelli C . Influences on decision-making for undergoing plastic surgery: a mental models and quantitative assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116(3):907-16. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000177691.81162.e5. View

16.

Ingargiola M, Burbano F, Yao A, Motakef S, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Burish N . Plastic Surgery Resident-Run Cosmetic Clinics: A Survey of Current Practices. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38(7):793-799. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy065. View

17.

Chen J, Girotto J, John Kitzmiller W, Lawrence W, Verheyden C, Vedder N . Academic plastic surgery: faculty recruitment and retention. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133(3):393e-404e. PMC: 4007687. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438045.06387.63. View

18.

Davison S, Hancock M, Sinkiat M, Enchill Z . Oral Surgeons as Cosmetic Surgeons and Their Scope of Practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(4):872e-879e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005447. View

19.

Marsidi N, van den Bergh M, Luijendijk R . The best marketing strategy in aesthetic plastic surgery: evaluating patients' preferences by conjoint analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 133(1):52-57. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436528.78331.da. View

20.

Long E, Gabrick K, Janis J, Perdikis G, Drolet B . Board Certification in Cosmetic Surgery: An Evaluation of Training Backgrounds and Scope of Practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146(5):1017-1023. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007242. View