» Articles » PMID: 38074765

Age-related Change in Muscle Strength, Muscle Mass, and Fat Mass Between the Dominant and Non-dominant Upper Limbs

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Dec 11
PMID 38074765
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Any form of physical activity is recommended for the older adults to maintain their physical function; however, the effect of daily activities on muscle function still needs to be investigated. Humans always use one dominant hand to perform tasks, providing a natural situation for research on the effect of daily activities on muscle function.

Methods: Five hundred and twenty-six healthy adults were recruited from the community in Beijing. Muscle strength was assessed using a handgrip dynamometer, lean mass, fat mass, bone area and bone mineral content of upper limbs were assessed using dual-energy X ray-absorptiometry. The results were compared between the dominant and non-dominant upper limbs.

Results: The dominant upper limb had better muscle strength, lean mass, bone area and bone mineral content than the non-dominant side. The difference in muscle strength and lean mass between the two upper limbs decreased with the advanced age. In older age, fat mass of upper limbs increased in men, but not in women.

Conclusion: Daily activities can maintain better muscle function in the dominant upper limb than in the non-dominant side; however, the delaying effect on age-related decline in muscle function was limited.

Citing Articles

The metabaging cycle promotes non-metabolic chronic diseases of ageing.

Cheng Y, Liu R, Wang R, Yu K, Shen J, Pang J Cell Prolif. 2024; 57(10):e13712.

PMID: 38988247 PMC: 11471437. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13712.


The effect of self-identified arm dominance on exercising forearm hemodynamics and skeletal muscle desaturation.

Schwartz J, Fongwoo T, Bentley R PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305539.

PMID: 38885214 PMC: 11182511. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305539.

References
1.
Anderson L, Liu H, Garcia J . Sex Differences in Muscle Wasting. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017; 1043:153-197. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_9. View

2.
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K . Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. View

3.
Hiraoka A, Tamura R, Oka M, Izumoto H, Ueki H, Tsuruta M . Prediction of risk of falls based on handgrip strength in chronic liver disease patients living independently. Hepatol Res. 2019; 49(7):823-829. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13322. View

4.
Reinders I, Murphy R, Brouwer I, Visser M, Launer L, Siggeirsdottir K . Muscle Quality and Myosteatosis: Novel Associations With Mortality Risk: The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 183(1):53-60. PMC: 5006223. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv153. View

5.
Bohannon R . Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015; 18(5):465-70. DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000202. View