» Articles » PMID: 38074044

Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors As Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Dec 11
PMID 38074044
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

is a gram-negative bacterium that chronically infects the gastric epithelium. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a promising alternative, being more potent than standard proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing P-CAB and PPI-based therapy, confirmed infection, and measured eradication rates after at least four weeks. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on therapy type and trial location. Quality assessment used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, RoB 2.0, and statistical analysis was performed using ReviewManager (RevMan) 5.4 (2020; The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, P-CABs demonstrated superior overall efficacy, consistently observed in the first-line treatment subgroup. However, no significant difference was found in the subgroup receiving salvage therapy. Another ITT subgroup analyzed the impact of geographical location, favoring P-CABs in the overall study population and the Japanese subgroup. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the subgroups of other countries. In the PPA, P-CABs showed superior efficacy overall, consistently seen in the first-line treatment subgroup. However, no significant difference was found in the subgroup receiving salvage eradication therapy. Another PPA subgroup analysis considered the geographical impact on eradication rates, revealing P-CABs as superior to PPIs in the overall study population and the Japanese subgroup, but not in other countries. No significant adverse event outcomes were observed. P-CAB-based triple therapy is more effective than PPI-based triple therapy as the primary treatment for eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. Nevertheless, regarding salvage therapy, both treatments show comparable efficacy. Additionally, the tolerability of P-CAB-based and PPI-based triple therapy is similar, with a similar occurrence of adverse events.

Citing Articles

Role of second look endoscopy in endoscopic submucosal dissection and peptic ulcer bleeding: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jagirdhar G, Perez J, Banga A, Qasba R, Qasba R, Pattnaik H World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(4):214-226.

PMID: 38680197 PMC: 11045352. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i4.214.

References
1.
Garnock-Jones K . Vonoprazan: first global approval. Drugs. 2015; 75(4):439-43. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0368-z. View

2.
Chey W, Leontiadis G, Howden C, Moss S . ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112(2):212-239. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.563. View

3.
Ang D, Koo S, Chan Y, Tan T, Soon G, Tan C . Clinical trial: seven-day vonoprazan- versus 14-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 56(3):436-449. DOI: 10.1111/apt.17070. View

4.
Dang B, Graham D . Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance: a WHO high priority?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 14(7):383-384. PMC: 6905073. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.57. View

5.
Lee J, Park K . Optimal First-Line Treatment for Infection: Recent Strategies. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017; 2016:9086581. PMC: 5187483. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9086581. View