» Articles » PMID: 38066445

COVID-19 Pandemic and Initiation of Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: a Nationwide Analysis of Claims Data

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted the delivery of medical care. It remains unclear whether individuals diagnosed with new onset disease during the pandemic were less likely to initiate treatments after diagnosis. We sought to evaluate changes in the treatment initiation of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified individuals with incident AF from 01/01/2016-09/30/2021 using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The primary outcome was initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 30 days of AF diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included initiation of OAC within 180 days of diagnosis, initiation of warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), rhythm control medications and electrical cardioversion within 30 days of diagnosis. We constructed interrupted time series analyses to examine changes in the outcomes following the onset of the pandemic.

Results: A total of 573,524 patients (age 73.0 ± 10.9 years) were included in the study. There were no significant changes in the initiation of OAC, DOAC, and rhythm control medications associated with the onset of the pandemic. There was a significant decrease in initiation of electrical cardioversion associated with the onset of the pandemic. The rate of electronic cardioversion within 30 days of diagnosis decreased by 4.9% per 1,000 patients after the onset of the pandemic and decreased by about 35% in April 2020, compared to April 2019, from 5.53% to 3.58%.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic did not affect the OAC initiation within 30 days of AF diagnosis but was associated with a decline in the provision of procedures for patients newly diagnosed with AF.

Citing Articles

Initiation of Anticoagulants During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Sweden: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Samuelsen P, Wettermark B, Nyberg F, Hajiebrahimi M Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025; 136(2):e14119.

PMID: 39757371 PMC: 11701204. DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.14119.


COVID-19 Diagnosis, Oral Anticoagulation, and Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Yang L, Tang S, Guo J, Gabriel N, Gellad W, Essien U Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024; 24(5):693-702.

PMID: 39136872 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00671-3.


COVID-19 pandemic and trends in clinical outcomes and medication use for patients with established atrial fibrillation: A nationwide analysis of claims data.

Hernandez I, Yang L, Tang S, Cameron T, Guo J, Gabriel N Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 42:100396.

PMID: 38689680 PMC: 11059438. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100396.

References
1.
Zhang Y, Zhou L, Gellad W . Potential savings from greater use of $4 generic drugs. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(5):468-9. PMC: 3074338. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.46. View

2.
Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A . Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(1):348-355. PMC: 5407170. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw098. View

3.
Durant T, Peaper D, Ferguson D, Schulz W . Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Laboratory Utilization. J Appl Lab Med. 2020; 5(6):1194-1205. PMC: 7454564. DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa121. View

4.
Yang L, Brooks M, Glynn N, Zhang Y, Saba S, Hernandez I . Real-World Direct Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2020; 126:29-36. PMC: 7275920. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.034. View

5.
Kutschera M, Ritschl V, Reichardt B, Stamm T, Kiener H, Maier H . Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Initiation of Immunosuppressive Treatment in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in Austria: A Nationwide Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(18). PMC: 9503597. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185308. View