» Articles » PMID: 38066435

Stakeholders' Experiences of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in an Inpatient Hospital Setting: a Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-ethnography

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is considered the gold standard approach to improving a range of outcomes for older adults living with frailty admitted to hospital. To date, research has predominantly focused on quantitative syntheses of the international evidence with limited focus on qualitative synthesis of stakeholder perspectives. This review aims to resolve this research gap by identifying and synthesising qualitative studies reporting multiple stakeholders' experiences of inpatient CGA.

Methods: A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted. Qualitative or mixed methods studies that included qualitative findings on the experiences of CGA in an inpatient hospital setting from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCP), older adults, and those important to them were included. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration: CRD42021283167) and the 10-item Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Results were synthesised as a meta-ethnography.

Results: Eleven studies, which reported on the experiences of 153 HCPs, 91 older adults and 57 caregivers were included. The studies dated from 2011 to 2021 and three key themes were identified: (1) HCPs, older adults and caregivers report conflicting views on CGA as a holistic process, (2) most HCPs, but only some older adults and caregivers view CGA goalsetting and care planning as collaborative, and (3) all stakeholders value care continuity during the transition from hospital to home but often fail to achieve it.

Conclusion: While HCPs, older adults, and caregivers' values and ambitions related to CGA broadly align, their experiences often differ. The identified themes highlight organisational and relational factors, which positively and negatively influence CGA practices and processes in an inpatient hospital setting.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study of Process, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

OShaughnessy I, Robinson K, Whiston A, Barry L, Corey G, Devlin C Clin Interv Aging. 2024; 19:189-201.

PMID: 38343726 PMC: 10859053. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S434641.

References
1.
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert M, Rockwood K . Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013; 381(9868):752-62. PMC: 4098658. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. View

2.
Bridges J, Flatley M, Meyer J . Older people's and relatives' experiences in acute care settings: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 47(1):89-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.09.009. View

3.
Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N, Denhaerynck K, Flamaing J, Moons P . The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 58(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02621.x. View

4.
Elwyn G, Durand M, Song J, Aarts J, Barr P, Berger Z . A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017; 359:j4891. PMC: 5683042. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4891. View

5.
Reynish E, Hapca S, De Souza N, Cvoro V, Donnan P, Guthrie B . Epidemiology and outcomes of people with dementia, delirium, and unspecified cognitive impairment in the general hospital: prospective cohort study of 10,014 admissions. BMC Med. 2017; 15(1):140. PMC: 5530485. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0899-0. View