Motion Detection in the Presence and Absence of Background Motion in an Anolis Lizard
Overview
Physiology
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Anolis lizards respond to a moving object viewed in the periphery of their visual field by turning their eye to fixate the object with their central fovea. This paper describes the relative effectiveness of different patterns of motion of a small black lure in eliciting these eye movements and the way motion of a backdrop of vegetation affects the response. The stimulus was positioned 45 degrees from the animal's line of gaze and oscillated in the vertical axis at different frequencies between 0.5 and 10 Hz. At each frequency, the amplitude of the oscillation was increased until the lizard flicked its eye towards the stimulus. The minimum amplitude needed for response (0.22 degrees of visual angle) was independent of frequency and waveform. The probability of any response occurring was, however, lower at higher frequencies (7 and 10 Hz) and a 1.5 Hz square wave evoked the greatest proportion of responses. Sinusoidal oscillation of a background of vegetation at 1.6 Hz during or before motion of the stimulus lure reduced the probability of an eye flick but did not raise the minimum amplitude needed for a response. The suppressive effect was greatest when the lure was oscillated at frequencies close to that of the background. It is concluded that Anolis, which rely upon motion to detect objects in the periphery of the visual field, filter out irrelevant motion such as that of windblown vegetation by responding preferentially to particular patterns of motion and short term habituation to commonly present patterns of motion.
Bian X, Pinilla A, Chandler T, Peters R Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):6383.
PMID: 33737677 PMC: 7973430. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85793-3.
Underwater caustics disrupt prey detection by a reef fish.
Matchette S, Cuthill I, Cheney K, Marshall N, Scott-Samuel N Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1924):20192453.
PMID: 32228405 PMC: 7209061. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2453.
Long-range neural inhibition and stimulus competition in the archerfish optic tectum.
Volotsky S, Vinepinsky E, Donchin O, Segev R J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019; 205(4):537-552.
PMID: 31123813 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01345-1.
The protective value of a defensive display varies with the experience of wild predators.
Umbers K, White T, De Bona S, Haff T, Ryeland J, Drinkwater E Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):463.
PMID: 30679660 PMC: 6346059. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36995-9.
Visual "playback" of colorful signals in the field supports sensory drive for signal detectability.
Gunderson A, Fleishman L, Leal M Curr Zool. 2018; 64(4):493-498.
PMID: 30108630 PMC: 6084605. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy046.